states we are going to show you them shaded in purple on a map that the pro-choice gutmacher institute says are certain or likely to ban abortion based on currently in books or transient states but that is just the effect today of the supreme court s 5-4 decision. what happens tomorrow and months and years from this moment? that, we don t know. in fact, many democrats tonight are expressing concern that the decision could provide legal justification to overturn other rights, secured by supreme court precedent. including those covering contraception and same-sex marriage. and they have reason to be concerned after justice clarence thomas suggesting doing just that today as well. this is what justice thomas wrote in a concurring opinion, quote, for that reason? future case, we should reconsider all of this court s substantive due process precedence, including griswold lawrence, and obergefell. he continues because any due process decision is demonstrably erroneous. we have a
families, advisors, whatsoever. the financing of this project didn t even have a single american involved. reporting. certainly in the sound that was just played she seems, you know, robotically supportive of the president s, you know, doing exactly what he did, which was lying about the election and pretending that it was, you know, making sure that every vote counted. i mean, i certainly see a discrepancy between what ivanka said to me and what she said to the committee. as to whether there s anything material with respect to that, that would be up for others to determine. sherman thompson said today essentially they re not really looking at any indiscrepancies in what ivanka trump may have said. to you what is the and obviously nobody has seen the finished product of your film which is going to bow on
going to change, no. and we can change things, but i keep talking about that. a project didn t even start. hang on, let s take this slow. so you re tying the failure to act against racism to the money in football and to initiatives, like the effort to create a super league for the elite clubs in europe? i m struggling to see the connection. i see the connection because i was so surprised, the fact the way everyone was, you need to stop it, and they shut down the project. but the racism is for so many years and it s notjust football. you mean the will isn t there to really tackle racism? yeah, the real will is not there. like i say, i will tell you maybe something really sensitive i m not sure we should ban racist people. because because which message they going to get? they re not going to learn. they re going to say, 0h, we put them in a box because i m racist.
it s their power to explain the reason they re doing this. but is it going to change something? no, but i support any cause. because i had enough of people pretending they want to stop against racism, they re pretending. but when you touch their pocket, that s when they act. that s why i had enough. so i m for the taking knee, but if it is going to change, no. and we can change things, but i keep talking about that. a project didn t even start. hang on, let s take this slow. so you re tying the failure to act against racism to the money in football and to initiatives, like the effort to create a super league for the elite clubs in europe? i m struggling to see the connection. i see the connection because i was so surprised, the fact the way everyone was, you need to stop it, and they shut down the project.