and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. so, special counsel jack smith has ten business days left if he wants to beat fulton county district attorney fani willis to an indictment. we have talked a little bit about that. dea willis has indicated that at some point between july 31st and august 15th she may bring charges against donald trump for his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election in georgia. and mr. smith, whose federal indictment could over lap significantly with da willis s state indictment, well he likely wants his federal case to go first. at least one of the two grand juries and that da willis has empanel down in fulton county has already started its work as of this week. and either one of those grand juries could be asked to indict trump. but while we are waiting for a potential charging decisions here, it turns out that we should still be keeping our eyes on florida, and not just mar-a-lago. the new york times is reporting tonight that p
has already started its work as of this week. and either one of those grand juries could be asked to indict trump. but while we are waiting for a potential charging decisions here, it turns out that we should still be keeping our eyes on florida, and not just mar-a-lago. the new york times is reporting tonight that prosecutors have asked questions about boxes of documents being moved, not only at mar-a-lago, but also at other trump s own properties in florida, including the trump national doral golf club, which is near miami, and the trump national golf club in jupiter, also in florida. that is according to a person familiar with the matter. that would seem to be some real news here, as far as the special counsel s classified documents investigation is concerned. it means that it might not just be the storage rooms, and the bathrooms and a at mar-a-lago, with all the boxes of wrongfully retained government documents. there might be more stuff squirrels away at doral and you p
their nuewspapers tomorrow reflect the shift. it reads roe overturned. the subway said what the u.s. supreme court abortion decision means for ohio. the miami herald in mal, the end of roe v. wade means anger, fear, and praise for a land mark ruling. already the ruling has had a huge impact. more than a quarter of states have so-called trigger laws that ban abortion. those in arkansas, kentucky missouri, oklahoma, alabama, sol south dakota banned abortion. idaho, tennessee, north dakota ban after 30 days. texas is expected to ban sometime after that. and then there are 12 other states, we ll show you those shade in the purple on a, on a map that says are certain or likely to ban abortion based on some combination. laws previously on becomes or political trends in the states. that s just the effect today of the supreme court s 5-4 decision. what happens tomorrow? and months and years from this moment. that we don t know. many democrats tonight are expressing concern that the d
this is andrea mitchell reports. with new reaction to that damming report from the texas house of representatives condemning the response by officers and the egregious decision making that prevented law enforcement from storming the robb elementary classroom and stopping the mass shooting when 19 grade school students and two teachers were killed. there s nothing we didn t already know. the only difference was they stopped pointing fingers. leave it to the department of public safety to have superior fire power. should have gone in. they knew better. they stood around just like everybody else. police body cam footage showing the police force waiting more than an hour in the school s hallways after the initial interaction between police officers and the gunman. along with an earlier attempt to communicate with the shooter by embattled police chief pete arredondo. there was a deadly mass shooting in indiana at a mall outside indianapolis where three people were killed a
states we are going to show you them shaded in purple on a map that the pro-choice gutmacher institute says are certain or likely to ban abortion based on currently in books or transient states but that is just the effect today of the supreme court s 5-4 decision. what happens tomorrow and months and years from this moment? that, we don t know. in fact, many democrats tonight are expressing concern that the decision could provide legal justification to overturn other rights, secured by supreme court precedent. including those covering contraception and same-sex marriage. and they have reason to be concerned after justice clarence thomas suggesting doing just that today as well. this is what justice thomas wrote in a concurring opinion, quote, for that reason? future case, we should reconsider all of this court s substantive due process precedence, including griswold lawrence, and obergefell. he continues because any due process decision is demonstrably erroneous. we have a