So some Risk Assessment. Are calculated. And the items variy at all of them contained history and the rest simply a few different categories, and conclude and bills, education and demographic variables and particularly gender age and include psycho social and in a corrections official and they ask things et cetera. Explicit variables and rather this was not always true and many words until explicit based but the modern instruments because theyre essentially indicators of poverty and so we can expect these instruments to have a racially impact. In my view many of the variables that go into the scores are simply inappropriate and possibly illegal factors on which to base the treatment of criminal defendant. And im not saying that those things are not correlated or predictive of recidivism. Crime is obviously correlated with poverty in our society, although we should remember that the extent of that correlation may be exaggerated by what the fact the recidivism they measure getting caught
Colorado . Yes we do. With Water Quality engineers so we worked collaborative leave with the epa and others to provide those resources to have a colorado solution. Part of your job is the people of the state of colorado that the water will be saved. Does it concern you that as the chairman noted as a followup to my question in the there was zero engineers at the epa working on the mind that had the high potential to blow out . With the state of colorado handled it that way . It concerns me but that doesnt mean they were not involved in some capacity. You are in the government. It is your job to have oversight. Wouldnt have been prudent for the epa to have that oversight to make good choices before we had a catastrophe . I dont know if they rely and other resources. He would handle the very differently . Our department has its own engineers for that situation. While we were talking, if you have the unlimited budget going forward, would you be supportive of the goods and your chin legisl
I dont think the United States has earned on that at all. My own approach, we talked about a little earlier, my own approach was to have intensive look, i would say the following t structure still exists. Hes not bound by it, but that doesnt mean hes not implementing at least on the issue of security cooperation. It goes on now. From israeli stand point, as far as i know, they transferring revenues they have collected and still have the designated areas of a, b and c. The structure still exists. You dont have an active Peace Process right now. What you have instead is something of a wave of terror violence. It isnt organized, its being carried by 15 and 25yearolds. They portray and dont show stabbing but only the result. False narrative out there that israel is trying to do what exist in hebron, completely untree. You untrue. You have an agreement that we contributed to between the Prime Minister, the king of jordan which is going to put cameras that it is not being changed and i would
Under the hyde amendment, zero taxpayer lawers, this is a matter of law that go into the abortions. The v. A. Program and medical health care, the government does work in the health care, and under the hyde amendment, zero taxpayer dollars go toward abortion. So this comes down to what do we think about the attempts the practical attempts to make it almost impossible for a clinic to get started that performs abortion. As long as it is legal and women want to exercise their legal rights, i think it is wrong to instead of trying to change the law, to try to do things like get rid of planned parenthood and the clinics that provide these things, that is the way to go about this. If you disagree with borgs, i respect that, even if i dont agree with it. But the fact of the matter is taxpayer dollars dont go to the performance of abortions. Obama care, by the way, also had a an exemption for churches. The catholic church, for example, which and and other religious institutions that oppose abo
Supplemental proposal we put out last year. But the whole idea is and this is following the congressional mandate the importer must have a program, a documented program where they have identified their suppliers, theyve come to understand their suppliers capability for food safety, theyve approved the suppliers, they know the practices is supplier is under taking and they look at records and they and under some circumstance, when justified by risk because its intended to be a riskbased foreign supply Verification Program we would envision the u. S. Based importer doing an audit. Having an audit conducted an on site audit of that foreign producer. So its having a real program that we can then audit and obviously go behind that and sample product when its coming in, go behind that and actually inspect the foreign facility if we choose to. But it thats accountability for the importer thats the new feature. The word audit has a different meaning than inspect, isnt that true . So when theyr