Emil michael made at a dinner with journalists. He said uber should dig up dirt on journalists critical of the company like sarah lacy of pando daily. Ubers c. E. O. Later took to twitter and said the comments at a recent dinner were terrible and do not represent the company. His remarks showed a lack of leadership and a lack of humanity and a departure from our values and ideals. But at least one prominent uber investor Ashton Kutcher tweeted what is so wrong about digging up dirt on a shady journalist . I spoke about all of this with sarah lacy, founder and editor of pando daily as well as cory johnson, our editor at large. Take a listen. I first heard about this from ben smith. The story has been really focused to me and travis and emil. Lets not forget, this was said at a table full of journalists. Arianna huffington, michael wolff, people from business insider. One thought this was wrong. One thought this was wrong and wrote a story under intense intimidation, and that was ben smi
Thanks for the question. I think that the appropriate way to do this is pretty much whats being done right now actually, and such using airstrikes to limit the freedom of movement and the ability to move oil and smuggle it as easily as isil was able to be for the airstrikes started. Meanwhile, buying time for an advice and assist effort and Capacity Building effort to try to stand up in some cases local Security Forces or the iraqi army to conduct effective operations is insulated to push isil back from the territory is controlling. I appreciate that, i dont mean to cut you off but from 20032011 we spent 24 billion, the United States taxpayer spent 24 billion training 938,000 iraqis how to fight. And to equip them, train them. And who we have 30,000 sunni that are over running the country. As isis gets stronger and stronger, we are back again with this training operation and i just have some misgivings about, you know, whats that saying that the definition of insanity is doing the same
Introduce your relationships on behalf of veterans. Creams in the appeals process, not necessarily sent to the board, but theyre still in dba because that is where the majority of the claim said. Weve got a laundry list of initiatives. Automation initiatives, staffing initiatives and the like that we ask cube within the context of the resources weve got. He may or may not recall when i came in on the 24th of july and said we need 17. 6 billion. There is actually 360 million for vba for us to be able to hires that for nonrating claims appeals and fiduciary. It is still Personnel Research institute press. Is there any room to begin to look at how we assign presumptions based on an mos or where somebody was deployed. Theyre submissive that right now. Catoctin here before the number one benefit application being hearing loss and can we increase presumptions based on an mos perhaps as a way thats a good question. I dont know which the extent that has been out. The last to bring to your atte
Cetera, so thank you for the giving me the opportunity to give that plug. And join ustion tuesday here on cspan 3 for programs focussing on health care issues. Well show you remarks from larry murlow and a house hearing on Medicare Fraud all starting tuesday at 8 00 p. M. Eastern. Plenty more Live Campaign 2014 debate coverage coming up tuesday on cspan. Starting at 8 00 p. M. Eastern, an Arkansas Senate debate between incumbent mark pryor and republican congressman, tom cotton. Recent polling has this race as a tossup. Right after that, South Carolina govern nikki haley faces off with Vincent Sheheen and tom ervin. And then John Kitzhaber versus dennis richardson. 10 00 p. M. Eastern also on cspan. With live coverage of the u. S. House on cspan and the senate on cspan2, here on cspan3, we compliment that coverage by showing you the most relevant congressional hearings and Public Affairs events. Then on weekends, cspan 3 is the home to American History tv with programs that tell our na
Applicable to antiterrorism methods, i dont know. I think all of these models are heavily data driven. So one would need a lot of data. But to the point that these models, these predictive modelling are able to predict things that may relate indirectly to terrorism or criminal activities, the systems are suggesting that we are going that way. Other thoughts on that question . Theres a system in chicago that the Chicago Police department has deployed which both has been touted and criticized, but it does somewhat the neighborhood or block level predictive deprediction bs as to criminal activity as well as i understand individual level identifying people who may be either victims of crimes or perpetrators of crimes. Again, both touted and highly criticized. Any thoughts or comments . One quick one creating a feedback loop. You see every crime that occurs on corner acts and draw an overdrawn example that you thought it was real dangerous. Thats the main one from my perspective. So this is