President scott. Here. Vice president lim. Here. Supervisor farrell. Here. Commissioner ferrigno. Here. Commissioner follansbee here. Commissioner sass here. We now have a quorum. We will now take item number one. Item number one is the approval of theminutes of the regular meeting of august 11, 2016. Are there any Public Comment . All those in favor say, aye. Opposed, nay. The minutes are adopted [gavel] item 2. Item 2 is gen. Public comment on items that are not on todays agenda. Are there any Public Comments on items that are not on todays agenda . I only have a few minutes but i did want to mention that we will Start Talking to the board about the benefits that the members will receive and we have a quite a few members who did not have access to these benefits before or they used it and had not wanted it but its been run through hsf and it has been monitored and it has been vetted andwe thank you for that. Thank you and thank you for bringing your thanks. We need that. Yes sir . Go
Before we begin we can get emotion to excuse supervisor mar. Without objection the gavel. Item 1 and one to update the definition of final competition for time and under the San Francisco employees retirement system. And to include in the definition, tatian trouble under the judges retirement system judges retirement system two. Peter b data. Supervisor cohen is the sponsor. Alternate over to our good thing to everyone for coming. Good morning. Item 1, before us is brought to us in attempt to address an issue that is was in and im indulging this is an issue in my capacity as president of our retirement board. When the ship code defines final, tatian as, outdated and doesnt accurately get several of our current San Francisco Employee Retirement members. Specifically, this old definition doesnt include word able members of the judges retirement system to include the use of compensation under the, system. This ordinance is pretty clean and straightforward. Itll update an old definition of
I have another question. Just like to remind the commissioner, we have a full agenda. You say the current residents will not be affected. The current residents of these housing generally are elders, seniors, many housing, you do have Young Children. The Young Children it could be a couple of years old or teenagers. You know, they are currently residing with their mothers. Are you covering those Young Children too when they get older. When they currently, under the 29 properties, seven of them are designated as family buildings. Hump designate family . Seven. Thats just the designation meaning that if you to apply to get in there, you will be applying to those children. There are grandparents that are taking care of their children. I understand that. Thats the designation per hud. Basically if you are on lease on the property, then you are part this program. You are eligible for the temporary relocation for being on lease. We did run a huge ad Family Member campaign for the last couple
Should have. We sent a letter indicating our concerns and input. At the meeting, we also had ann hintton give update about the scan grant that we received. Which was about 10,000. The purpose of that grant was to have our staff mentor three other counties to develop their Long Term Care integration plans. Bill haskell who was our former staff person along with ann hintton worked together with three different counties in california. Specifically ventura, stanislaus and yolo counties to put together their Long Term Care integration plan. Theyve done that and now theyre going to be submitting to to the scan foundation. We completed the work that we were given the money to do. In the meantime, our department is submitting another grant with scan and so scan will consider our grant proposal to continue the work. The other item we had on the agenda would highlight the event that we had to commemorate our tenth anniversary of the down sill. That was on october 23rd. Maureen took a lot of phot
That state, now, are they going to impact their rise in a faster way . A much faster rate than the Silicon Valley can rise. Theyll rise up much faster. I think that, san bernardino, same thing. They could do extraordinary things with that new state. But they cant do now. Right now, they are kept down with the current regime theyre kept down. If you really want that to happen, you need another state. You need new states. You need people to create their own environment and make it great for them. Yes, maam. To me the federal state interplay in this model is confounding. I cant envision the feds ever wanting to recognize six states in the placement of one, much less giving them proportionate representation in the house and additional senators and wouldnt state ratification be needed. I will just focus the question on pending recognition by the feds. What would be it seems to me that the practical realization of the benefits of the model would be seriously crimped in terms of dividing the