profit who then gives money to labs for questionable purposes. by doing so, they have a disclaimer as well as no oversight requirement issue. on the basis of the indirect nih funding to the wuhan lab, the question remains, why didn t fauci affirmatively act. is poo-pooing of the idea that the virus had to be engineered to infect humans shows he acted to prohibit our knowledge of suchr such. tmp tmp our knowledge of such. he should have engaged the lab
profit who then gives money to labs for questionable purposes. by doing so, they have a disclaimer as well as no oversight requirement issue. on the basis of the indirect nih funding to the wuhan lab, the question remains, why didn t fauci affirmatively act. is poo-pooing of the idea that the virus had to be engineered to infect humans shows he acted to prohibit our knowledge of suchr such. tmp tmp our knowledge of such. he should have engaged the lab
a lot of folks probably have not. your initial thoughts on this idea that michael bloomberg might be throwing his had in the ring? it shows the extremely unsettled nature of the democratic race. it shows the democrats angst, whether or not we have the right candidate to beat donald trump. i shows the battle for the soul of the democratic party is in full effect. i think one thing that s lost in this, yes, michael bloomberg has tremendous resources and expertise, but he governed the most diverse city for 12 years. he s made incredible strides in working for gun safety, climate change, urban infrastructure, many of the issues that democrats hold dear. i think to suggest he would be missing out because he s been a late entry into the race is underestimating michael bloomberg. the retail politics that goes so far in places like new hampshire, iowa, south carolina, especially, how would he make up for that, that lost time? i think he s been on the national stage for decades. he has be
yes and no. it sounds like you think he s in. i think he s seriously considering it again. sounds like you think he s in. sounds like you think he s probably in. i ll go with probably. i ll go with probably. he seems more in than not in. he has structural issues. you have to get on the ballots in these states. some of the states have early deadlines. what does save him is he does have this money. also, we re looking at a country where we are doing well economically in terms of jobs. but we re also looking at a country where people can t afford health care, where people can t afford college tuition. there are a lot of people suffering that have jobs, but they can t make enough money to pay their rent or their mortgage. at a time when people need help, when they need a lifeline, people want to know that someone connects within and understands their pain. when you re a billionaire that s poo pooing the idea making sure everyone has access to
you want to set up the meeting? do you want to set up the meeting? no, no. are they friends of yours? i think there s blame on both sides. you look at both sides, i think there s blame on both sides, and i have no doubt about it and you don t have any doubt about it either. again, that s just some of what the president has said. kirstin, i want to float this idea that emily tisch susman floated to me a few minutes ago, perhaps the president s outreach to african-american voters specifically, maybe it s not about moving the needle, kirstin. maybe it s about giving the impression to white voters that the president actually cares. is that a theory that resonates with you? you know, craig, i m not sure what his goal is, but he s certainly not resonating with black voters. this has been a critical election we ve been following really really closely in essence in the survey we did with black women s roundtable,