profit who then gives money to labs for questionable purposes. by doing so, they have a disclaimer as well as no oversight requirement issue. on the basis of the indirect nih funding to the wuhan lab, the question remains, why didn t fauci affirmatively act. is poo-pooing of the idea that the virus had to be engineered to infect humans shows he acted to prohibit our knowledge of suchr such. tmp tmp our knowledge of such. he should have engaged the lab
profit who then gives money to labs for questionable purposes. by doing so, they have a disclaimer as well as no oversight requirement issue. on the basis of the indirect nih funding to the wuhan lab, the question remains, why didn t fauci affirmatively act. is poo-pooing of the idea that the virus had to be engineered to infect humans shows he acted to prohibit our knowledge of suchr such. tmp tmp our knowledge of such. he should have engaged the lab
profit who then gives money to labs for questionable purposes. by doing so, they have a disclaimer as well as no oversight requirement issue. on the basis of the indirect nih funding to the wuhan lab, the question remains, why didn t fauci affirmatively act. is poo-pooing of the idea that the virus had to be engineered to infect humans shows he acted to prohibit our knowledge of suchr such. tmp tmp our knowledge of such. he should have engaged the lab