Excess portion of the public right of way which they are now encroaching. I dont know exactly what happened during the Building Permit process but both planning and Building Department approved the design. We are required to review the infrastructure, which involved the kin strux of a sidewalk along nianic to the official sidewalk width, which they have. There are no sidewalks along panama. There has been comments from the public related to the lack of travel on niantic street as relates to access to the bart station. I know the department of public works is currently working with the California Department of public transportation, with caltrans, to see whether a sidewalk can be constructed adjacent to the freeway side of niantic. It is under continued discussion with caltrans at this point. Honestly from the departments perspective, we were given this information kind of after the fact, after the Building Permit was approved, after construction had begun and well underway before we fo
Adequately show the neighbors light well onsite plan. Its a small light well but its set back and one that is not shown. That is somewhat relevant, as the appellant mentioned there is an interpretation from the zoning administrator. That is found in zoning bulletin no. 4 that covers many things and covers the filling of light wells, and there are provisions and 11312 requires for the infilling of the envelope, but if you infilling in a blank wall we dont require 311 or 312 for that, and if there is a matching light well, depending the district, you may be required to match it. In this zoning i dont think that its required to match the light well. But as the appellant pointed out this expansion into the side court light area is visible to the properties to the rear on roff, the planner referenced the light wells. However it could be seen from a site that is offsite. I believe that the project should be required to do 312 neighbor notification. The 312 . 311 . 312 is for the neighborhood
I have no speaker cards. Is there any general Public Comment . Okay. Seeing none, the meeting is adjourned. [adjourned]. Good afternoon, everyone, this is the monday, december 3, 2012 meeting of the land use and Economic Development committee of the San Francisco board of supervisors. My name is eric mar, the chair. To my right is vice chair supervisor cohen, to my left is supervisor scott wiener. We are also joined by supervisor olage items acted upon today will appear on the december 11 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you. Colleagues, we have 7 items on the agenda. Im going to ask if there is no objection if we could take no. 7 as a courtesy to supervisor olage to hear that item first. Are there any objections . Miss miller, could you please call item 7. Item 7 is a resolution to appear the Sharp Park Golf Course from the natural area plan. Thank you, we have supervisor christine that olage at this point we are not going to be continuing this and i would as
Saying that every single parcel gets notice knowing that notice when most of those parcels are occupied by renters and most of that mail gets returned as undelivered, is that a superior notice . Then sending notice to everybody who participated in the planning process for a number of years, and that includes renters, includes whoever had any participation, left any kind of way of being contacted, you know, thats the tradeoff there. Which is more effective notice. I would just say if youre going to choose a notice of acceptance, you would look at maybe if the Property Owners property would actually be rezoned, right . If im in a Residential District rh1 or whatever and my property is not going to be rezoned anything different, maybe this is more general notice i would get. If im in a property where im going to become legal nonconforming or property is being up zoned or down zoned, thats more my concern. So, how do we im not saying that should be fairly easy to separate out. I just think
Have 7 items on the agenda. Im going to ask if there is no objection if we could take no. 7 as a courtesy to supervisor olage to hear that item first. Are there any objections . Miss miller, could you please call item 7. Item 7 is a resolution to appear the Sharp Park Golf Course from the natural area plan. Thank you, we have supervisor christine that olage at this point we are not going to be continuing this and i would ask that we continue it to the call of the chair. If there are no comments, lets open this up to Public Comment. Is there anyone from the public that would like to speak to this item . Were going to limit this to two minutes per person. Im just wondering what does this do in a couple sentences, the proposal. Perhaps supervisor olage. Ill just read from the agenda itself. If youd like to set up a time we can talk about it. Cuttinging Environmental Review down . Generally this is not an Interactive One here. You can give your testimony. Well, i want to get it on the reco