Saying that every single parcel gets notice knowing that notice when most of those parcels are occupied by renters and most of that mail gets returned as undelivered, is that a superior notice . Then sending notice to everybody who participated in the planning process for a number of years, and that includes renters, includes whoever had any participation, left any kind of way of being contacted, you know, thats the tradeoff there. Which is more effective notice. I would just say if youre going to choose a notice of acceptance, you would look at maybe if the Property Owners property would actually be rezoned, right . If im in a Residential District rh1 or whatever and my property is not going to be rezoned anything different, maybe this is more general notice i would get. If im in a property where im going to become legal nonconforming or property is being up zoned or down zoned, thats more my concern. So, how do we im not saying that should be fairly easy to separate out. I just think
Was used from. In 2010 there was an amendment to acquire a plan and that was just amended in april. So, now plans are required when your you can certify t dr but wu you have to should how youre going to rehabilitate your building you can use the value of the t dr. Yes as part of the amendments the most recent amendments the department felt there should be some invested interest in the building of where the t drs coming from. We base that provisions in the code whereas, soon as the t dr is sold from 9 property they have to enter into an agreement of how over the, you know, first year and 5th year how theyre going to maintain that building. Not that all the proceeds of the sale go back into the building but a portion for the maintenance commissioner. This may have been there i may have missed it. Since the program was amended to allow the adjacent property has any property used or sold t dr the mint. Thats right. All those t dr has been sold well move this off to Public Comment thank you
Buildings. I consider a 30 number plus adding a transfer tax. That make sense to what the general Public Benefit as well as the buildings is concerned i did want to make clear i think that its always a problem to fund fixing up a public building that is such as 1 across the street. We sat through a number of hearings and ending battles between the veterans and the trustees and that battle very nearly imperiled the financing for fixing up the building. I think that the public t dr idea could produce a lot of money that the city needs to fix up those buildings to preserve them but do it in a way which the fixing up of the building was not as much at the peril of the varies factions. I would prefer as a citizen of San Francisco to see buildings fixed up financed and this way rather than with bonds. Thank you commissioner and i have one comment and i appreciate the report i think it was well done. One of the concerns is to make sure theres not an appearance of the conflict of interest that
I do appreciate the gentlemans idea of trying to use up the funds to care for those buildings or so the private sector can care for their own buildings. I consider a 30 number plus adding a transfer tax. That make sense to what the general Public Benefit as well as the buildings is concerned i did want to make clear i think that its always a problem to fund fixing up a public building that is such as 1 across the street. We sat through a number of hearings and ending battles between the veterans and the trustees and that battle very nearly imperiled the financing for fixing uphe building. I think that the public t dr idea could produce a lot of money that the city needs to fix up those buildings to preserve them but do it in a way which the fixing up of the building was not as much at the peril of the varies factions. I would prefer as a citizen of San Francisco to see buildings fixed up financed and this way rather than with bonds. Thank you commissioner and i have one comment and i a
Recorded. This recording is posted on the citys website and if feasible, broadcast on the citys official televised channel. The ero must then render their decision within 14 days of that hearing. So, this is the proposed joint ordinance. And now id like to introduce supervisor kim to describe that a little bit and then im sorry, andres power is here from supervisor wieners office and then ill go through the department recommendation. Thank you. Thank you, am i rodgers, and thank you all, Planning Commission, its great to be back here. Its great to report back that we were able to unify two legislations regarding how to bring a process for our ceqa negative declaration exemptions together. And were really thrilled that we are able to pass it unanimously on tuesday. And were excited to see that we now have a deadline officially in place for exemptions and negative declaration decks, 30 days after first approval which was something we had compromised on, but we were able to get a number o