Kinds of conditions our Transportation System is in now as well as the new growth, both in terms of residents and jobs in the city. And so the scope of the Task Force Work does not address the operating deficits nor does it solve all of the problems that have been identified. About 10 billion have been identified as a need for transportation. And this leaves a gap of 6. 3 billion. The task force identified what we believe is required in terms of infrastructure and well be proposed some new Revenue Sources to fund a portion of that gap. So the three recommendations that will be brought forward from the task force is to invest in programs with the greatest impact to first maintain the current Transportation System which we found in great disrepair and enhance the system and sfand expand the city system to meet new growth and also set to pursue three new Revenue Services combined to address that significant portion of that gap and as well as to continue to support and seek additional stat
Cato strongly opposes and attentive to prevent his success by gaining time with which he spun up the debate until its too late to conclude upon anything. Hey, the filibusters only been around 2064 years since circa 59 b. C. Dont believe the left when they falsely claim the filibuster was created the state of the by aaron burr. The late robert byrd was the otherwise to another speaker, norm orenstein, from 2005 said some things about republicans attempt use Nuclear Options and judgments i agree with. Let me emphasize that this is a radical step it has taken. This will require breaking the, steamrolling the parliamentarian. And i must tell you ive been very disappointed in the reporting of this issue which tends to use a kind of cost and shorten over matters making it appear as if this is something that anytime can be done by a majority. They just havent elected to before. Thats not the case. Its very clear in senate rules if you challenge a ruling constitutional, that challenge is debat
Probably non conforming uses. In terms of creating new non conforming uses there is none of that but a good one is the creation of pdr in bay view as well as other examples. I think the notice is just important because we get people at the last minute that who didnt realize this was going on because they didnt get a legal notice and people dont see things until theyre in front of their faces anyway, and i guess the other question about the notification. Okay. Now youre going to have legal non conforming uses and some knew that but they were allowed to exist. Is there like the eastern neighborhoods some amnecessity or process by which you are doing letters of determination . What is the process if youre existing legal non conforping office use and now were going to be zoning you in the sallies and making you permanently non conforming what do say they want add more office space what do they do . Sure. Anybody already a legal non conforming use and remain that way things basically stay t
This 11th street corridor and i earlier stated my preference for what i believe is wmuo which is option 3b and one of the reasons it would also allow office and presumably allow retail in that area which contributes to day time uses that would help the vitality of the area because if you have a lot of entertainment uses typically clubs they dont come into play until late at night and allowing some office and retail and day time commercial things would keep the district moving throughout the day too. We had a discussion while we were having a break there on the gas lamp in san diego and im not trying to hint this is what were looking to create here but they do have an area where a concentration of dining establishments and some clubs are easily walkable because you often have to be cabbing from one part of San Francisco to another to go to different scplais and we have a lot of walkable areas and like san diego there are few walkable areas and why its concentrated there. The other quest
Local matches for additional funds. So, in order to make a big dent in the needs and to fund them, the task force is recommending three new Revenue Sources, two 500 million in Revenue Bonds in a year and year after dedicated to improvements. And second vehicle license fee which has been set at 2 persona number of decades and early 2000s to 2. 6 5 and increased the vlf to its full 2 percent cap in reservation for the task force and a couple years later proposing a sales tax dedicated to city improvement. This is the projected plan for the next 15 years. Whats happening next year . Thats going to depend on the board of supervisors to develop the time to do so. Your recommendation for new revenue is so far in the future. My question is at least, last year, 5 years ago when we were going through planning did you identify Revenue Sources that are being utilized today. Im looking for something more in the shortterm. As part of the Transportation Task force work we did look at the existing fu