shed light on why this happened. we re also not showing any faces in the frame. in addition to three guests who will be joining us shortly, all experts in aviation and crash investigations, they will be weighing in on what they see in this video. because whatever brought the flight down on approach yesterday to nepal s second largest city likely happened or became unstoppable in those seconds that you ll see. 72 people were above the twin engine european made airliner, at least 68 are known to have died. now, the last video is difficult to watch. the plane in the sky. we should warn you again so is this video inside the plane. the view is out the left side of the aircraft. you see the wings trailing edge. the back side of the wing as the plane starts to bank to the left. in a moment you ll see a white flash where we do an edit. then the plane levels momentarily and then just a few seconds later, it all goes wrong and the plane banking again drops. take a look. we have live re
airport, the pilot asked for a runway change. why would a pilot ask for a runway change? one of the reasons may be just a wind change. they were reported winds at potentially a certain parameter and they prefer to land what looks like to be on runway 12. this is a brand-new airport and the concrete has barely been touched so i m sure it was obviously in sight but that would be the reason. the other aspect is maybe what caused this was a distraction in the maneuvering to change the runway that they were originally vectored to land on. and it sounds like this request did come from the pilot. yeah. i want to thank you all tonight. thank you very much for the limited information that we have. coming up, new developments in the biden classified documents case and whether more searches will be taking place. plus the white house calling out republicans for what they say is hypocrisy. also tonight, a new george santos lie about his college career and new comments from house speaker kev
triggering an urgent investigation. boeing issued a statement saying, they re providing technical assistance at the request and under the direction of government authorities investigating the accident. the key questions, why did the pilot ask to turn back just minutes into the flight without declaring an emergency? did a technical issue the night before the crash play a role, even the lion air says it fixed the problem. and with no severe weather and no evidence of an explosion or fire, how could a brand-new plane plunge so suddenly from 5200 feet? something happened to lose control of that aircraft or something that lost power or something that made that aircraft go down. reporter: the clues to solving this aviation mystery may lie in the plane s fuselage and the so-called black boxes lying somewhere at the bottom of the java sea and for the millions of people who fly in these planes, answers can t come soon enough. before lion air flight 610
the descent of the plane. the prosecutor said, this action could only have been voluntary. and then later, the captain is heard pleading to get back into the cockpit, but the co-pilot, heard breathing normally until the plane crashes, does not react. you can hear the commanding pilot ask for access to the cockpit several times, the prosecutor says. he identifies himself, but the co-pilot does not provide any answer. it should be noted that the airbus 320 mechanism for the cockpit door allowed someone inside the cockpit to lock the door in such a way that the normal procedure for getting in from outside the cockpit is disabled for five minutes, as depicted in the airbus training video. the video also shows an emergency procedure for gaining access to the cockpit if the pilot is incapacitated. the captain moves the toggle switch to the lock position. the open light remains extinguished. now if we look at the code pad, the red light is lit, confirming the door is locked. be careful, aut
dusseldorf and the pilot asked the co-pilot to take over and sounds indicate that the pilot left the cabin and the cockpit door closed. at this stage, quoting again, the co-pilot is in control alone, the prosecutor said. it is when he is alone that the co-pilot manipulates the flight monitoring system to activate the descent of the plane. the prosecutor said this action could only have been voluntary. and then later, the captain is heard pleading to get back into the cockpit, but the co-pilot heard breathing normally until the plane crashes, does not react. you can hear the commanding pilot ask for access to the cockpit several times, the prosecutor says. he identifies himself, but the co-pilot does not provide any answer. it should be noted that the airbus 320 mechanism for the cockpit door allowed someone inside the cockpit to lock the door in such a way that the normal procedure for getting in from outside the cockpit is disabled for five minutes, as depicted in the airbus training