he s a boss. he s made a personnel decision. i think he s made it wrongly. i think this new information that there actually was basically an order off campus and this injunction, if that assistant a.g. hasn t told his boss that, that s excuse enough. that s why we re really curious to hear from the attorney general s office. did he know of this and if he didn t know of it, did shirvell tell anyone on the staff and if he didn t that would seem to be pretty damning stuff. that would be another grounds for firing but not the only one. jim tierney, good to have you on the program, jeff toobin as well. let us know what you think. join us on the live chat. we re going to continue to follow this case. the hearing is monday. sarah palin saying we re not checking the facts about a democratic politician. the question is has she really checked her facts. see the tape and decide for yourself. keeping them honest, ahead. and the heart wrenching details about the final hours of tyler cleme
ideologically in sync. i m going to put distance between myself and jeff on that. i don t think that you can make this a political ideal. he s a boss. he s made a personnel decision. i think he s made it wrongly. i think this new information that there actually was basically an order off campus and this injunction, if that assistant a.g. hasn t told his boss that, that s excuse enough. that s why we re really curious to hear from the attorney general s office. did he know of this and if he didn t know of it, did shirvell tell anyone on the staff and if he didn t that would seem to be pretty damning stuff. that would be another grounds for firing but not the only one. jim tierney, good to have you on the program, jeff toobin as well. join us on the live chat. we re going to continue to follow this case. the hearing is monday. sarah palin saying we re not checking the facts about a democratic politician. the question is has she really checked her facts. see the tape and decide
perhaps because they re ideologically in sync. i m going to put distance between myself and jeff on that. i don t think that you can make this a political ideal. he s a boss. he s made a personnel decision. i think he s made it wrongly. i think this new information that there actually was basically an order off campus and this injunction, if that assistant a.g. hasn t told his boss that, that s excuse enough. that s why we re really curious to hear from the attorney general s office. did he know of this and if he didn t know of it, did shirvell tell anyone on the staff and if he didn t that would seem to be pretty damning stuff. that would be yet another grounds for firing, but not the only one. jim tierney, good to have you on the program, jeff toobin as well. join the live chat at ac360.com. we re going to continue to follow this case. the hearing is monday. sarah palin saying we re not checking the facts about a democratic politician. the question is has she really checked
the money we bring in. somebody to read the reports, break it down into simple terms and tell me what to change. i haven t hired anyone because i feel i can t afford this person, and don t know what qualifications to look for. follow the money. it s very important. i mean if even she hires someone she can t pass it over. my first instinct you can t bring in people, bring in the machines and entrepreneurs turned to business dashboards that show them in real-time. i think that s too complex. software has a cost too. i like at this as a hiring and personnel decision. you need to bring in people with specialties but not specialists. you want somebody with an accounting background but when you only have fiver to ten people under your roof, you want to bring in this versatility in your staff. not just accountants but all employees that you bring in. what about the idea, at the beginning, hiring someone to help you, so you understand at
mccrystal. he had not engaged in the kind of behavior that obviously rob porter has. his transgression about showing insubordination up the chain of command that s different than domestic abuse. what the president did do was stand on principal. he was confronted with a decision about how he was going to handle this personnel decision and he stood on principal. he made clear to everybody below him on the chain of command that people will be held to a high standard and if they weren t going to meet they would be held accountable in not doing that. he came forward. he was decisive and he came forward and explained the decision he made. when you make a decision on principal that makes it a lot easier to defend. there certainly is no explaining away the malpractice we ve seen on the communications fron. when you make a substantive decisions for the right reasons it s a whole lot he s where are to defend. i was just thinking about the mccrystal thing and it seems