case? or is he going to invoke his fifth amendment privilege in any way? 0.0 chance he will provide anything substantive, he may provide something substantive as to carroll s case, which is not really a political one. it is a straight-up court case, in a sense. but, when it comes to anything juicy about what he did as president, doubtful we will hear anything because that is not even relevant to the underlying case. and, the other thing is he may not take the fifth amendment at all. he may use his own version of the fifth amendment. he has testified in many depositions, he has a veteran of depositions. so, the very idea, and i am guilty of this as well. when he first sat i thought oh, that is, it he cannot testify under oath because when you are under oath you are in the perjury trap and bad things will happen. but, you know, what he has done it. he knows how to do it, he is a veteran. i expect he will get in there instead of his invoking his fifth amendment he will use a version of
threatening our fundamental rights. yes, we need to focus on donald trump and his abuses. we need to follow his money. we need to find out where he s lawed rend money. we need to find out whether or not he s engaged in con spear geez here with reaction donald trump s new york attorney a lean haba is with us. so you have a candidate that ran on a platform to destroy one man in the state that she was going to be the attorney general with all that power. this is a civil case. wouldn t this be i don t think the president had any choice but to invoke the 5th because if one comma, if one period, if he didn t dot every i, cross every t, wouldn t he be facing a perjury trap in that circumstance based on the fact that she ran a whole campaign to take him down? yes, a hundred percent sean, you nailed it. the reality of the situation is, although we hear that the da has dropped effectively the criminal case, there were also reports that the da was waiting to see
our fundamental rights. yes,s, we need to focus on donat trump and his abuses. we need to follow his money. we need to find out where he s laundered money. we need to find out whether or not he s engaged in conspiracy herere with reaction, donald trump s new york attorney, alina harbor is with us . so you you have a candidate so you you have a candidate destroy one man inn the stateal that she was going to be the attorney general with all that power. this is a i civil case. wouldn t this be ? and i don t think the president had any choice but to invokee the fifth because if one comma ,if one period, if we didn t if he didn t every i crossou every t , wouldn tld he be facig a perjury trap in that circumstance? based on the based on the fact that she ran a whole campaign to take down. yes.dr 100% on you now thatt the reality of the situation is , although we hear that the d.a. has dropped effectively the criminal case, there were also reports thate
her oath of office. one example how it played out on the stand. do you think greene helped herself in her defense on the stand? well, if she s ultimately bounced from the ballot or charged with perjury. she lied i think throughout this hearing. yes, she would have hurt herself. proving perjury, she kept saying i don t recall, she talked to a lawyer and is trying to avoid a perjury trap. if she hurt herself in the court of public opinion. her detractors will continue to despise her and her supporters will continue to love her. one thing, she seemed to backtrack and be a little hess tavent. th hesitant and that could hurt some crazy believers who think everything is a conspiracy and all democrats are pedophiles. if she was asked if nancy pelosi is a traitor, she backtracked on