executive office couldn t get too powerful. we have legislative and judicial branches that could serve as waysch to put a check and balan, right, thean separation of powe, talk about the federalist papers and federalist 51 and why it s so important to dust off our middle school and high schoolbooks to make sure we understand the intent of the law and the framers. donald trump supporters don t seem to care. we care about the will of law. we care there s a strain on our over arching democracy, this oc country has always been a work in progress since its inception, slavery, mass genocide, actually not having equal rights for the vast majority of individuals and not even citizens. we ve come a long way. he has shown he doesn t care about the fundamentals of democracyfu and neither does hi supporters. he s doing incredibly well
week. what will be so instructive to witness, christine, whether or not when people can read prince harry s story, do they become more sympathetic towards him? so far we ve had excerpts taken out of context. this time people will be able to read all 410 pages of the british version and make up their own mind. it is a war of words at the moment and prince harry in his good morning america interview said something which i thought was one be of the most significant statements he s made throughout this media campaign. when asked if he felt that the monarchy was still relevant, stel important, he said, yes, but not in the form that it is now. that might give us a clue to his over arching motivation here. we know he wants to inform and improve the antagonist of the british press and tabloids. clearly he feels the monarchy needs to modernize and free
republican officials currently running for election not being willing to say they will accept the election results. that s a very being concern. the other has been the attack on the speaker s husband, paul pelosi. the president is close to the speaker, knows her husband quite well, and deeply affected by everybody s fear, that this current environment will lead to violence. this is as much about the president, his belief and over-arching concern as it is an electoral, political issue. that s why he s speaking about it. phil mattingly, thank you. joining me is chief political correspondent dana bash. always great to see you. this afternoon the president is getting focussed once again on the economy. we heard the federal reserve just raised rates again. another cnn poll showing that 75% of americans believe we are currently in a recession. now, this really assistants out, because we are not currently in a recession by any economic measure, but this gives us a
for our lives were much different than these working class folks. do i understand their anger? heck yeah. am i worried about the safety and transportation issues they re causing? yes. i think that is a real issue. do they have every right to be pissed after two years? oh, yeah. bakari. i don t like the language of the laptop class. we hear language from the right that is more divisive than helpful. you hear it oftentimes when you pit middle america versus everybody else or working class versus everybody else. the over arching theme is still the same. this is something i identified last night and something the white house and this administration have to do a better job, hearing the pain of americans. whether or not you are driving a truck or whether or not you re trying to make sure your kids go to school or whether or not you are wanting the president to
from some inside the administration that the rational for the u.s. taking this position in the midst of this crisis is perhaps not as understood as it used to be. not assume d as it used to be. the decision for the president to lay out stathe stakes. it will be impact, the necessity of the moment of the u.s. posture and position was a critical one. this speech wasn t scheduled at the start of this day. this speech was a speech that i m told has been in prep preparation, elements of it for a decent amount of time. they were trying to find the right moment to deliver this speech and deliver the multiple messages inside this speech but i think to your point, the over arching idea there were multiple audiences, directly to the russian people, allies and ukrainian people but to the