life of its own. covid-19 spoke to us from geneva. one of the things that keeps coming back to you want science, evidence, data, the database of bat coronaviruses was taken down and blood samples from workers at the lab they don t have access to those. they can t do a forensics examination of the lab but if they don t giver the most basic data, how is it science driven? we can t extract something we don t have access to. this is true for china and sarscovi 2 and the next one, as well. the next pandemic. according to every scientist we spoke to it s not a question of if, it s a question of when. and the w.h.o. says the newly formed scientific advisory group for the origins of novel pathogens may help them prepare for what is to come. the main purpose of this sago is to establish this over arching frame work for future
before. chris, let me read from you a piece, about what it s actually writing this as unexpected as the paths are, they will all experience something in common a life-altering epiphany about the unity of the universe, a kaling to change the world they return to for the better. do you relate to that? well, i don t think chandra has been in space. i think she s talking bigger than perhaps it will strike everybody. some people can walk into the sistine chapel or a redwood forest and not feel moved. some people will cry when they go in there. that same feeling of over-arching awe, of wonder at where we are in history, where we are in the university, it really strikes home with a lot of people. the crew that flew on the virgin
we were but dip into the point that really the headline that we heard from the president sitting there with the first family of jordan, the headline was, the president doesn t regret signing that order to stop separation of parents and kids. he kept referring to the phony story in the new york times. trump has complained to aides about why can t he create this over arching executive order to solve the problem? jeff toobin, let me go to you on that, but also, you hit on this a second ago, and the conversation about disrespect and discourse. what s interesting about all of this, despite all the criticism he s been getting, 90% of republicans approve of what the president is doing. this is the tribal moment in which we live. i believe that poll is largely taken before this border crisis has fully been absorbed, i m not sure it s still at 90%, it s got to be very close.
is investigating coordination between the trump campaign and russian officials. this indictment, just like the one on friday, only reinforces our over arching point when it comes to the special counsel s investigation, which is president stated there is no evidence of clueing because none existed. reporter: we ll see what other details we learn at the hearing this hour. indictment is only two pages and pretty thin on details. dana? dana: maybe you could help explain the point of mueller s charge here is that it is a crime to lie to an investigator. i think it sends a pretty loud message. what do you think? reporter: well, it s a violation of a code lying to federal investigators. the thing to be watching for here is whether this guilty plea is really just another step towards putting pressure on gates to ultimately cooperate and flip and testify against paul manafort, who is one step removed from sort of the inner circle of the trump campaign.
and i think that that s what we are hearing out of the white house briefing today. the over arching thing here that i ve heard from lawmakers who have met with him in recent weeks is that he wants a deal. he is not specific about what is in that deal and that s why we are seeing him probably being all over the place today. and sarah huckabee sanders coming in hand trying to say he s still committed to the wall. but i think the president could be all over the map on this issue as long as he gets a deal he ll call it a wall whatever it ends up being if the democrats agree to it. so i think the big thing we ll be watching for in the next couple of weeks is how far will democrats go to make a deal? like what will be the minimum that they will want and agree to? obviously it s very confusing in the meet ing earlier when the