Mi ornht. Santa rosa is sitting at 36. 51 in San Francisco. Livermore 44 and san jose 48. Lets take a moment to take that in. Thats the aw moment of the morning. Wind is calm out there. But we have had a slight onshore flow and that helped to put moist air in the area. Down side is its causing fog and we are seeing what in the north bay where we have quarter mile visibility which is better than its been all morning long. And novato is fine. Santa rosa is fine. Watch out for the stretch of highway heading on 101. See some of the fog. And again its just a slight onshore flow. So its not dramatic. Its not going to change things dramatically for us other than we have patchy fog this morning. High pressure is very much in control and you see it here. So today, we are going to see warm temperatures yet again a little warmer than yesterday at the coast we will be in the low 70s and the we will see mid70s in the bay and about 80s if you go into the inland pockets like santa rosa and concourt g
Time change. Here is a picture of San Francisco and will come to the 9 00. Along with mike and gasia my name is sal. I have been to like it. I was ready for bed at about 4 30 yesterday. I do prefer to get darker a little later. Doesnt it by the way have to go to bed but it is still light outside . I purchased a mask right before i joined mornings on 2 and have gotten my moneys worth out of it. We will talk now about the weather with kyla grogan who is in for steve paulson. Anytime i do this shift i have no problem sleeping afterward because i am not on the schedule like you guys are. It is fun to be here with you this morning. It is going to be a beautiful and gorgeous day in the bay and hope you can enjoy the blue skies with the temperatures warm again talking 13 degrees above normal with 56 right now in San Francisco and they have warmed up in santa rosa with 52 in oakland and you can see it is just 50s all across the map. We had the slightest onshore flow and now it is negligible. W
The appropriate plantings there and encourage the project sponsor to eliminate the stair penthouse. Second. Commissioner fung . Commissioner moore . Mr. Lum, could you explain why the unit that is on the top, which now gets the roof deck, and i agree with the shaping of the roof deck and the possible elimination of the penthouse, why does it also need to have a deck the lower level . The main level . That is correct. It accentuates we had to do a setback for that because of the 30foot, 10 foot rule that says if you are doing in averaging of the rear, the building cannot be any taller than 30 feet. It has to be setback 10 feet to the 40foot height. The only other choice would be that would be a roof. It doesnt seem like a very nice thing for the living room to look upon. Or the walkable part of the roof would be smaller than bringing the deck all the way to the edge, because i do believe that the utilization of that roof, by a balcony all the way to the edge does not look much more mass
We are serving a population where it wasnt 80 80 are either employed or looking for paid jobs. They are parttime students. Really they are just taking a full close look course load and working parttime. We know theres 26 who to work 26 plus hours. That was a survey that was done in 2019. Having disabilities, being of color, being trans, they are probably the ones working these jobs. If you are giving away access, multiple access to education, they would have to transport themselves to the college and we probably will not have any enrolment. Students will not have access to educations. Is that something we are ready to take away from people . From a population that is already marginalized . I am all for Affordable Housing i grew up living there. This is not aggressive enough. Im sorry, it is public land pick 100 of it should go to Affordable Housing. We know that the cost of land in San Francisco is incredibly high. Why would we privatize it . We should be asking for a more aggressive p
The project sponsor . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. I just wanted to say im sorry. Dr requester, you have a twominute rebuttal. I am friends with my neighbor and just now friends with the developer who will never lou here and just to clarify, a lot has been raised about the two neighbors. 25 capra is owned by a Large Institution and some are controversial and so as such, it decided it cannot oppose a developer or project regardless of the merits of the case and 39 capra who has tol told us its waiting to follow precedent and in their case, they look at future development and that makes it all the more important of whats happening to 33 capra because it will be followed next door. My presence here today is not about the impacts but affecting everything in the neighborhood and just happening to be carrying that forward today. Thank you. Dr requester number two. I would like to just make two comments. This is about a lot of people who calm here in support of the project. These ar