Instead of concluding the language we call out those specific types as youve described them as opposed to this general language. Thats any intent and hopefully with the support of the board and if thats accepted by the author of the main ordinance ill withdrew my amendment but i would ask the president in my conversations with the planning staff we can insure were going to include those types of unit weve discussed. So colleagues just to clarify supervisor mar your wrooug your amendment. Through the president is that your intent to be as boarded as we can about excluding the bmrs and the sros and the city induced unit. Thats my intent i seemed mount prop c and small fund income restricted and involve the lo low income rate that leaves the question around inlaws and that is one we should vote on. I withdrew the part of the amendment that refers to city substituted housing but lease in the part of new mexicos. And colleagues any other questions or discussed on any of the amendments last
Medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen to talk about this. What do we know here, elizabeth . Brianna, what we know is that he was tested as you said like anyone to come in contact with the president or be around the president is tested. He was asymptomatic. Apparently he felt fine and he was positive for covid19. I think this teaches us a great lesson. Can you imagine if there was testing on a much more wide scale basis system to what the president gets . Imagine how many more of the cases that we would find. It could be any of us. The problem with this virus is that so many people are asymptomatic and so theyre Walking Around spreading this virus without knowing it. We just happen to catch the Ohio Governor because he was tested because he was going to be with the president but imagine how many more people are like that out there. Thats right. Because he is just another person who has tested positive after doing these white house tests. And at this point in time even though it does not
General counsels office, they arent going to notify the target. Theyre found by the same disclosure and i think the law should account for that. You know, one of the things that was interesting, i was recently reading the legislative history of ecpa, one of the things that congress stressed, even though it got a fair amount wrong when it drew the 180day line, one of the things they were trying to do, and they made this very clear, is sort of promote the adoption of new technologies like this. So i think without clarifying this, and you know, without clarifying the law in some of these other respects, you risk undermining the adoption of these new technologies which provide a number of benefits as greg was alluding to. Weve talked a fair amount of content, weve been using it as emails for content generally, obviously, both microsoft and google and many other companies store an enormous amount of content, other than emails, you know, including the backed up concepts of phones. But there
Stephen kicked off the debate in a recent and widely read article for Time Magazine where he delved into the absurd hospital charge master, revealing a hospital pricing model as absurd, they charge the highest prices to the people who are least likely to pay them, the uninsured. He pointed out his point of view that the only force disciplining it is medicare, which still guarantees wide access and quality medical care for beneficiaries. We could bring more to the system and save patients a lot of heartache and expense. In rebuttal, he says our system is so dysfunctional because medicare distorts pricing in ways that produce perverse outcomes for payers. Allow me to introduce both of our speakers before we begin. Stephen designed a company to create a viable Business Model for journalism to flourish on line. He is a feature writer for magazines and trains journalist and founded brills content magazine. He is a graduate of yale and yale law school. The chief executive officer of the game
Supervisor avalos supervisor breed no there are 5 is and of nos this amendment has failed correction. Just making sure youre all paying attention laughter the next one is supervisor campos prsht are shortterm rentals that rental that are significant to ellis act evictions. Supervisor campos supervisor chiu no supervisor cohen. Just so im clear. This is the amendment to prohibit shortterm rentals that were subject to ellis act within years. Supervisor cohen i supervisor farrell marry no supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang no supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed there are 8 is and 3 nos this amendment passes and supervisor breed had an amendment and this has to do with also i believe a private right of action and ammunition with the ellis act evictions. Supervisor campos supervisor chiu supervisor cohen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed pr there are