Supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed no there are 5 is and of nos this amendment has failed correction. Just making sure youre all paying attention laughter the next one is supervisor campos prsht are shortterm rentals that rental that are significant to ellis act evictions. Supervisor campos supervisor chiu no supervisor cohen. Just so im clear. This is the amendment to prohibit shortterm rentals that were subject to ellis act within years. Supervisor cohen i supervisor farrell marry no supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang no supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed there are 8 is and 3 nos this amendment passes and supervisor breed had an amendment and this has to do with also i believe a private right of action and ammunition with the ellis act evictions. Supervisor campos supervisor chiu supervisor cohen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor bree
Supervisor chiu no supervisor cohen no supervisor farrell no supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang no supervisor wiener no supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed no there are 5 is and of nos this amendment has failed correction. Just making sure youre all paying attention laughter the next one is supervisor campos prsht are shortterm rentals that rental that are significant to ellis act evictions. Supervisor campos supervisor chiu no supervisor cohen. Just so im clear. This is the amendment to prohibit shortterm rentals that were subject to ellis act within years. Supervisor cohen i supervisor farrell marry no supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang no supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed there are 8 is and 3 nos this amendment passes and supervisor breed had an amendment and this has to do with also i believe a private right of action and ammunition with the ellis act evictions. Supervisor campos supervisor chiu supervisor cohen
Supervisor mar supervisor tang no supervisor wiener no supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed there are 8 is and 430 notice this amendment is adapted the mexico one has to do with supervisor campos with the transit occupies this need to be received back to planning roll call. Supervisor campos supervisor chiu no supervisor cohen no supervisor farrell no supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang no supervisor wiener no supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed no there are 5 is and of nos this amendment has failed correction. Just making sure youre all paying attention laughter the next one is supervisor campos prsht are shortterm rentals that rental that are significant to ellis act evictions. Supervisor campos supervisor chiu no supervisor cohen. Just so im clear. This is the amendment to prohibit shortterm rentals that were subject to ellis act within years. Supervisor cohen i supervisor farrell marry no supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang no supervis
That is broad than what ive described. Through the chair thank you, president chiu for raising this i guess in my conversations with the planning staff its unclear whether or not prop c as like 1950 mission is built is that under the inclusion. Im not familiar with the 1950 Mission Project but fits its part of the Mayors Office of housing they would not be allowed to sub lease. He the other Small Site Acquisition Program i i know that the city and the Mayors Office of housing is utilized to make sure we have enough affordable unit throughout the city is that type of program covered as a residential unit. Ill recommend if those are the types of specific uses instead of concluding the language we call out those specific types as youve described them as opposed to this general language. Thats any intent and hopefully with the support of the board and if thats accepted by the author of the main ordinance ill withdrew my amendment but i would ask the president in my conversations with the p
Committee back to Committee Reference or a reference to Planning Commission and that will be one file and the second file will be youll have those amendments that require a referral back to committee around Planning Commission supervisor chiu first then supervisor kim and i want to suggest i am wondering if we can before duplicating making the substituted amendment would be with we can agree on and duplicate the file and at this point are supervisor breeds and supervisor kim i believe those are the two colleagues that have amendments that trail and need to go back to committee. Any outlooks. That was my intention to duplicate the file after the non sufficiently susan substantive files. Well be making the nonsubstantive amendments first with that, the first one is the amendment promoted by supervisor breed that was regarding the response required for no violations so again, this is a technical amendment that was made do we need a roll call no well take that without objection. The amendm