the iea, president trump is excite satisfied iran is certified. if he turns around and say they re not certified, on what basis, what s changed. that ll open up a big big can of worms. if the deal collapsings iran has a lot of options. they clearly don t want the u.s. to get out of this deal. he said they could resume enrichment to a higher level of uranium. is that a direct threat they d speed to a nuclear bomb if the deal gets out. i think what iran is saying if the deal if they pull out of the dale, the deal pulls off. i do think iran will stick with the deal even if we pull out. we want them to continue to trade with europe, russia and china all of which is allowed by the deal. the chans are we stay in, then
on what basis was sheriff arpaio and deputies detaining people that otherwise wontd be detained, other than the fact they thought they might be undocumented immigrants? great question. they were awful lawful stops, and the government admitted that. lawful stops, one case stopping a guy on suspicion of armed burglary. what happened is after they would clear the guy, they would learn he potentially was an illegal immigrant. somebody would be stopped, asked for license and registration, wouldn t have an american id, maybe have a mexican passport, only speaking spanish, the deputy would ask in spanish are you here legally and the guy would admit i am not here legally. the deputy would call i.c.e. or border pa treel, i have an illegal alien, border patrol every case said bring them here. that s what he was convicted of that s what his office is accused of doing. it is a common practice.
jeff lrey a bit before i then challenge him. let me have it. we know that there was surveillance, we know have various ways, we can assume it s factual, that there was surveillance of russians that at one point picked up this conversation of general flynn s evolving discussions of sanctions and possibly other surveillance that may have mixed up other people. that is a fact. yes. what we need to know tomorrow is, on what basis was the surveillance done? this is probably, but i m not certain, we ll have to wait, incidental collection, as general hadden said on cnn yesterday, incidental collection on u.s. individuals, i worked with the white house in 2008 when we put that change, that amendment to the fisa law together. secondly, however, there could have been a warrant to go after american targets, perhaps flynn,
call. is it likely they would have known about the track record? [ overlapping speakers ] i don t think they need a warrant. i disagree with the sheriff. there s no need for a warrant. now, i do agree that an immigration detainer is not at all a command. it s a request. however, in light of the fact that the 1996 federal law requires cooperation, in light of the fact that these laws have not been challenged as they relate to sanctuary cities i really do that it s right for the time they be challenged. on what basis, joey? let me allow me to explain. i m glad you asked. challenged on the basis that the federal government is the authority on the law. when the federal government requires and says that you cooperate, you cooperate. you don t decide as a locality what laws to enforce and what not ton force. let me say this. it s one thing for a locality to affirmatively go out and start checking papers and determining who s legal and who s illegal.
burglars who had been in that community. on what basis was he a match? on the basis of skin color. they were teenagers, as well. no, actually, they were in their late 20s, according to some reports. the actual burglars and trayvon martin we know was 17 years old. so it was skin color and gender, i would say, because they were both male. but trayvon martin had nothing to do with those burglaries. let me go back for a second. i m trying to recall so many details. i think george zimmerman thought he was in his 20s when he said that to the 911 caller. he called him a kid. but he thought he was in subsequent interviews, said could have been in his 20s. but on the call, he said he was a kid. ultimately, i think the greater issue does come down to this. if people are being deluged with news about gang violence and shooting violence, doesn t that shape their information when they when they form fears? and they don t have to be white people. i m saying white people can be as a