call. is it likely they would have known about the track record? [ overlapping speakers ] i don t think they need a warrant. i disagree with the sheriff. there s no need for a warrant. now, i do agree that an immigration detainer is not at all a command. it s a request. however, in light of the fact that the 1996 federal law requires cooperation, in light of the fact that these laws have not been challenged as they relate to sanctuary cities i really do that it s right for the time they be challenged. on what basis, joey? let me allow me to explain. i m glad you asked. challenged on the basis that the federal government is the authority on the law. when the federal government requires and says that you cooperate, you cooperate. you don t decide as a locality what laws to enforce and what not ton force. let me say this. it s one thing for a locality to affirmatively go out and start checking papers and determining who s legal and who s illegal.