Angeles. Well speak with an adult entertainer later a shout. Fan. January twenty oh five pm and washington d c i a mob and your art in america well ever since former contractor and were snowed in the one point seven eight million classified documents to the world is hearing the nsa is internal structure of president obama has been walking the fine line of political fallout. If each of the permanent justice last week the president finally address the issue and announced sweeping reforms to the way the National Security agency collects digital information. The changes included some more oversight by the executive branch the working National Security letters that forced private companies to hand over customer information to the nsa and an end to section two fifteen of the patriot act which allows the ball collection of medicaid. Now some say the president s reforms went too far. Others say they didnt go far enough with this historic speech enough to quell privacy concerns expressed by and
To National Security agency to the surveillance program. Let me ask you, if im joe schmo, average citizen, if im google, what changes are going into effect beginning for me today . The program with the most attention is metadata relating to phone calls, the time of calls and phone numbers, that is in a database that the government controls and can query for information. There is a risk for potential abuse of that database. So what were going to do immediately, the government cannot query that database to access information from it without going to a court first and getting judicial review beforehand. Were going to transition out of that program and have somebody other than the government hold that metadata. Thats a big change in terms of Privacy Protection for all americans. Every americans phone data could potentially be collected in this program. The question of what to do with that data, the n. S. A. , the Intelligence Community, attorney general eric holder. You gave him 60 plans t
In europe and elsewhere, the scapegoating of my grants or minorities is leading to dangerous social tensions. Intolerance and hate speech continue to fester in myanmar. This year as we commemorate the tenth an resterly of the ram anniversary of the ramadan genocide, we must create conditions that support women and children. We must say yes to education and no to violence for women and girls. We must empower adolescents and youth with opportunity and employment. This year presents many chances for engagement including the youth forum and youth envoys Crowdsourcing Campaign on the 2015 development agenda. And youth will be central to seizing the chances that this year holds for shaping a more sustainable and equitable future. Your hard work in 2013 set the stage for major progress now toward the year of 2015. We now have 714 days left this our deadline until our deadline for the development goals. We must be speed up progress and reach our target. Member states have a road map to define
Exceed the capacity even before it opens. In an cli123 08 it was written the commission would take appropriations request under advisement in the course of the agents budgeting process. With 30 billion in taxpayer funding and liability and waste that exceeds capacity, why would the commission not request funding for a licensing process for the Yucca Mountains . Well, as i said earlier were moving forward with the courts order, and any further budgeting decisions will be commission decisions. The court determined the Commission Must move forward. The administration determined that Yucca Mountain is not the answer. It that is if the answer isnt Yucca Mountain. How do we meet the obligations by the court . Thats a policy decision that im going let you all wrestle with. Well, i think the house we can probably deal with it. We have some issues with the senate. The safety evaluations the nrc would be approximately six to eighth month and estimated 6. 5 billion. In september 2013 the 12 month
Senator grassley, we set a member number of occasions we find it there is a use and value to having an independent legal representative in the fisa Court Process in the appropriate circumstances. We would not advocate or recommend having one for all of the procedures that go on there. Many of them like a normal criminal cases are routinely done in an expert databases. They are done usually with a fair degree of asked etienne and efficiency and we think a permanent public advocate might impede that process if it is applied to every single thing that they are. They would also be some constitutional issues facing our public advocate on every single issue. We would propose that it be an amicus appointed by the court when the court feels that they have the need for another event another point of view when its a significant issue involving privacy issues, civil liberty issues that the court would like to have another view on. That would be a good example of a time. Something like both Data C