And fifteen minute discussion. Were going to get started here with round two of president s on whom oliphant was able to bestow his gifts and a country on which he was able to bestow his gifts by commenting visually, and with words, on those president s. Im mike nelson, the guy you had to put up during the first panel. Fortunately we have new people to add their voices to the wonderful voices you heard from the scholars who were on the first panel. Once again, weve got military Center People here. And the Miller Center, one of its main emphases is the focus on studying the presidency in depth, historical depths, with objectivity. In other words, were all in the business of doing stuff that an editorial cartoonist is not in the business of doing, which is reacting to events on a daytoday basis, which pat oliphant did more than 10,000 times in his 60 plus years as a newspaper cartoonist. Whereas we all strive to be as objective as we can, the job of the editorial cartoonist, and pat olip
Impart his gift visually with president s. I am mike nelson. I am the guy you put up with during the first panel. We have a new cast of people to add their voices to the wonderful voices you heard from the scholars who are on the first panel. Once again, we have the Miller Center pit people here. The Miller Center, one of the main emphasis is the focus on studying the president sees indepth, historical depth with objectivity. In other words, we are all in the business of doing stuff that in editorial cartoonist is not in the business of doing, which is reacting to events on a daytoday basis. Which path oliphant did more than 10,000 times in his 60 plus years as a newspaper cartoonist. Whereas, we all strived to be as objective as we can, the job of the editorial cartoonist and pat oliphant, as well as anybody who has ever done it, to provide comment, opinion, to provide something to provoke discussion, rather than perhaps, aspire to settle discussion. The panel today, this afternoon, w
By con batting and with words. I am mike nelson, im the guy you had to put up with during first panel. Fortunately we have a new cast of people to add their voices to the wonderful voices you have heard from the scholars who are on the first panel. Weve got miller saturday, people here one of its main emphases is to focus on studying the presidency indepth, historical depth, with objectivity, and other words we are all in the business of doing stuff that and editorial cartoonist is not in the business of doing which is reacting to events on a day to day basis more than 10,000 times in his 60 plus years as a newspaper cartoonist, and where we all strived to be as objective as we can, the job of the editorial cartoonist as well as anybody whos ever done, it to provide comments, opinion, something to provoke discussion, rather than aspire to subtle discussion. The panel today, this afternoon, which will cover the president s from george bush i dont use the h. W. He was george bush when he
In this room in one sense by the presence of pat oliphant. So please greet pat. But even more by the work of pat which yowull see on the screen. The culture he reptde esreprese highly specific. Daily perspective over the course of more than 60 years as a cartoonist, producing more than 10,000 individual cartoons, five days a week for the denver post, for several years, for the washington star for several years, and then along the way, pat oliphant became the first 20th century cartoonist to work independently of any newspaper. Thats how popular his work was, and it was syndicated through newspapers all across the country, out of his studio. So a specific daily comments on events as they were occurring, far from being balanced, they were opinion atded. That was part of their virtue. And obviously, not so much in words, although there are words, but especially in pictures and the work of the art of pat oliphant not just confined to cartoons but also to paintings and sculpture. Before i i
Ok, lets grab some lunch and come back on in. That is something we should be able to form in our republics. And just a last quick thought, misinformation versus information. To public is able differentiate between an advertisement. Speakers our previous ked about eight 800010,000 local jurisdictions that hold the responsibility to make sure their are free and Fair Elections in their venue. And it seems to me that it is asking quite a bit, the federal government is imposing quite a burden on these locals. Any of whom do not have cyber experience. Most of whom do not have knowledge with regard to the technology deployed even in the machines. Very few of which have resources to upgrade and the knowledge on what they should upgrade to. In what youted think the federal government should do elections are still driven by local and state responsibilities, to a cyst these 10,000 jurisdictions to prepare as best they can to manage the risk of hacking into the infrastructure. I would like someone