again, curmudgeonly? well, those two things are definitely not opposed, in global regulation and innovation. 0n the contrary, i think we need regulation in order to make this technology go well. that s my mission with all of these technologies to ask, how do we make them go well? of course, they have enormous potential to bring prosperity. that s the history of technology. but in the long run, it tends to bring great prosperity, and we enjoy the lives that we do at the moment, and only through technology can we support. it s sort of easy to call for regulation and demand that the international community acts together to achieve meaningful regulation. but isn t the truth of it it s never going to happen, because the key drivers of ai development are vast corporations, driven by greed, i suppose, on one level, and nation states, who are driven to a large part by national security interests and great power rivalries? the idea that those different actors
front line is here. at visa s command center in northern virginia, they monitor 76,000 transactions a second across more than 200 countries, facing off against hackers and fraudsters, working from the u.s. and abroad, determined to steal your money. these aren t your typical teenagers in a basement somewhere. these are well-funded, well-organized groups backed by criminal organizations or adversarial nation states. reporter: brandon received a legitimate text from visa, warning of a $2,000 fraudulent charge. seconds later, a scammer called, claiming to be from his bank and sending him a link he should click. when he did, criminals quickly reset his password. thankfully, his real bank, navy federal, blocked that attempt. and we were able to stop them from not only fraud on the credit card, but fraud toward my bank account as well. reporter: visa alone reports
what is a tragedy but a tragedy that has been largely limited to gaza and and israel in the northern border with israel to become a regional conflagration with lots of nation states involved. what i would suggest, and the biden administration isn t necessarily asking my opinion, but what i would suggest the guiding principle here be is that nobody gets to escalate, and as a consequence were i sitting in that oval office i probably would have taken more aggressive action against the houthis. now, the united states navy, of course, sank three of thai boat attacking shipping, but i think we need make it very clear that that attacking freedom of navigation in the red sea is an escalation, and it will not be tolerated. if the houthis want to find their ways to we would discourage this bush but if they want to jump into direct contact with israel that will be hair decision but they don t get to
Anyone who wants to be the former leader’s heir must strive to not just complete his unfinished project but relaunch it with the same personal commitment, rigor and creativity.