That was in the Planning Department a woman named bruce chafy and i worked with her and i it was in the open spaces that were on the private land that would to be maintained and open for the Public Open Space and they were to be maintained by someone entity and now unfortunately back in those days the Planning Department was not as sophisticated as this today or the city itself in record things. So the only thing that actually got recorded was a subdivision map itself which references the landscaping map, was to be on file if the sfaoe and the Planning Department since that time. Most of the departments have moved several times and the records have been misplaced somewhere. I have a feeling that maybe they can be found yet. But they have not had a chance to do it and as the president , mentioned, maybe that likely there is a discussion of the item in the minutes of the Planning Commission if we could establish when it was before the Planning Commission. There is also a likelihood that
Quite a number of residential subdivisions with the Single Family and multiple family areas and the Planning Commission reviewed those for our consistency and it was our master plan policies along with checking with the zoning that was in effect that did not recently been approved in 1960. And so this project had and the thing that the departments measure input on these subdivisions was looking at the open spaces that were provided in the landscaping treatment. And it did readily, little look at the bidding forms themselves and other than that it was within the density of them and it was in the other and they were not even the right and at that time so there was very little from that aspect. The project and the other inaudible there were two subdivisions and out of a very lengthy review by a planning that was in the Planning Department a woman named bruce chafy and i worked with her and i it was in the open spaces that were on the private land that would to be maintained and open for t
Time. I have a question, if the contractor were to Start Building what would be the action. If they started to building . Correct. Stop work order. Probably a fine. For that. You know . It is not advisable. You dont see it very often. Sow it would not be good. They dont have any structural drawings to build off. Okay. So they would not get very far. They could excavate and could not poor any foundations they would be working without a permit in essence. Okay, thank you. Okay, we are going to take public comment, but before anyone gets up i just want to make clear that this was an appeal filed by an association and under the boards rules that means that anyone who is a member of the governing board or an officer of the association should not speak under public comment, their time to speak is with the party, okay . So anyone who is not one of those people who would like to speak, please raise your hand. Okay, we are going to do the same process we did before. Ask people to fill out the s
Time mr. Pass moore who is here this evening and i understand at the time he was inclined to deny the variance application and that application was withdrawn and there were no Development Proposals on the site until 2009 when this Building Permit application was submit and this seeks to have a five story, four unit building of the subject property and also to subdivide it however they have broken out the lot in this case does not trigger a variance and it triggered a variance for the frontage but they have widened it at the front so it will no longer trigger a variance requirement. The department reviewed this and it was presentsed with the history of development here, and also concerns about the pattern of development and the concerns that were expressed in 98 about this being a required open space. And we could not find any evidence of it being required or conditioned to be maintained as open space. In the project that was proposed was code complying and it met all of the planning re
It is a typical urban condition. And the reviews will be reviews, but those are the views from a single room in each apartment. All of the other rooms of the apartment retaining the unobstructed city views and bay views. This project is not only about building housing on a vacant private parcel it also contributes to transform the rightofway and maintain the public garden and the project is a spot for the sensitive design and it will provide diversified housing and the existing public space and enhancing connectivity to the twin peaks. And it is a positive addition in the spirit of the San Francisco general plan. And for these reasons we respectfully request that the board up hold this permit as is. With no new conditions, and in accordance to the city Planning Commission, almost unanimous position, thank you very much. Mr. Sanchez. Could you switch off the projecter . Thank you. Thank you, Scott Sanchez the Planning Department, the subject property is located within an rm 1 and that i