I am ed walsh, on july 27, 2012 we conducted a inspection at 130 bush street. And myself and the inspector para entered the facility and went in and started Opening Doors and at that time, we saw miss lam engaged in a Sexual Activity with a white male. At that time, she was completely naked and we told them to get dressed and we need to talk to you outside of the room. At that time, the declaration says that the person was in the room with mis lam walked out and left the premises and got his clothes on and we spoke with miss lam. And as virginia explained to us our job is not to identify whether it is an act of prostitution or money engaged or anything like that, we dont do that. But we do, require people to are dressed properly and also, that provide massage, not some other type of service that is not appropriate so basically that is what happened. On july 27th, 2012 and this has been ongoing for a year because it is continuances and i am hear to answer any questions if you have any r
We will hear from the department now. Good evening, from the City Attorneys Office on behalf of the department of Public Health i have the two inspect ors here that can testify to what they saw in terms of whether or not this woman was committing an act of prostitution, again as i have pointed out they have neither the authority or ability to conduct a search or detain somebody. This was a task force inspection of the premises, and the police were otherwise occupied with other people on the premises, and other evidence,. So, you know, the situation is budget is no one denies the fact that she was in the massage room during the Business Hours engaged in sexual intercourse with a customer, and if you would like to hear from the inspect ors . I am ed walsh, on july 27, 2012 we conducted a inspection at 130 bush street. And myself and the inspector para entered the facility and went in and started Opening Doors and at that time, we saw miss lam engaged in a Sexual Activity with a white mal
Ability to permit or uphold or revoke permits. The ability for this board tonight to uphold or revoke the permit is certain. The animal ability to impose the conditions is not based on your firm that you had to litigate. Anything else . Other than submitting a nonpubliced nonauthority. Our firm loss. The Housing Committee won that one. Is there anything else . Anything close, any argument you can make from any other possible authority . Sure, the tul ran case does cite other authorities and the ability for other board conditions for tenant protection. Im paraphrasing tul ran now but those boards falling under the charter and executive session that the board of appeals has in exclusive authority to handle under the rent jurisdiction. The rent board has the authority and i charted the provision in my brief discussing the rent board. Counsel can i stop you, we are dealing with the issues of the case. Not with the merits oovment if i may address that point briefly . You did already. You ha
Also his assistant and they put in both of their declarations that they never had time to question the subject, although they call them as a client and they call them as a customer and he was neither. And it is fine, what i find very odd here is when dph went in there and walsh and para and they were accompanied by the Police Department and not one of those officers questioned miss lam. And they had an opportunity to question the subject and they did not question him. And miss lam was never arrested for the violations of 611 for the penal code and never cited. And walsh knowingly entered that room and looked for money and they would not have found money because she received no money. She was not soliciting or engaging in an act of prostitution in violation of 647 b of the peanl code those facts are not controvered whatsoever and they were not touched when they went to the hearing and i questioned walsh about this, about the facts of money and aside from not being able to make the case