The posting done for the revised permit . We have the notification by our Central Permit Bureau staff that was required on 1 16 13 and we received the affidavit that it was done on june 2013. On the permit . One last question. This permit now appears to have a lot of retaining wall as part of it which then involves a shoring of the structure above and everything else. You dont consider that to be a significant alteration . No, the criteria the engineers have used is evaluating the load bearing Building Elements with the method that they would use and again, its going to be a case by case basis in terms of the analysis and the plans. We have an engineer sitting across from the engineer and they are going to discuss what is going to be required to meet the code requirements. Okay. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Okay. Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is yours. I dont know, you know, we have so many lawyers here. I dont know whether this is just a clear administrative rec
Lot of retaining wall as part of it which then involves a shoring of the structure above and everything else. You dont consider that to be a significant alteration . No, the criteria the engineers have used is evaluating the load bearing Building Elements with the method that they would use and again, its going to be a case by case basis in terms of the analysis and the plans. We have an engineer sitting across from the engineer and they are going to discuss what is going to be required to meet the code requirements. Okay. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Okay. Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is yours. I dont know, you know, we have so many lawyers here. I dont know whether this is just a clear administrative record before they proceed onward or not. There are a number of things that i probably not going to get into what this board can and cannot do with respect to construction process. However, in my opinion the amount of work that is represented by the permit is sign
Permit now appears to have a lot of retaining wall as part of it which then involves a shoring of the structure above and everything else. You dont consider that to be a significant alteration . No, the criteria the engineers have used is evaluating the load bearing Building Elements with the method that they would use and again, its going to be a case by case basis in terms of the analysis and the plans. We have an engineer sitting across from the engineer and they are going to discuss what is going to be required to meet the code requirements. Okay. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Okay. Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is yours. I dont know, you know, we have so many lawyers here. I dont know whether this is just a clear administrative record before they proceed onward or not. There are a number of things that i probably not going to get into what this board can and cannot do with respect to construction process. However, in my opinion the amount of work that is repr
Our Central Permit Bureau staff that was required on 1 16 13 and we received the affidavit that it was done on june 2013. On the permit . One last question. This permit now appears to have a lot of retaining wall as part of it which then involves a shoring of the structure above and everything else. You dont consider that to be a significant alteration . No, the criteria the engineers have used is evaluating the load bearing Building Elements with the method that they would use and again, its going to be a case by case basis in terms of the analysis and the plans. We have an engineer sitting across from the engineer and they are going to discuss what is going to be required to meet the code requirements. Okay. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Okay. Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is yours. I dont know, you know, we have so many lawyers here. I dont know whether this is just a clear administrative record before they proceed onward or not. There are a number of things th
Anyway be addressing the soft story condition. There may be in the construction and repair to find the value. The soft story complying would have specific standard of performance defined in the criteria. If it building does require a soft story permit, they would have to do this permit and take out an additional permit to do the soft story. Yes. Unless they have proven their in compliance, thats one method otherwise they need to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. To your knowledge, when was the posting done for the revised permit . We have the notification by our Central Permit Bureau staff that was required on 1 16 13 and we received the affidavit that it was done on june 2013. On the permit . One last question. This permit now appears to have a lot of retaining wall as part of it which then involves a shoring of the structure above and everything else. You dont consider that to be a significant alteration . No, the criteria the engineers have used is evaluating the load b