a former labor leader in your formal capacity. what do you think was going on? why did johnson get what was the largest majority since margaret thatcher in 198 7. labor corbin was the unpaletable mixtufixture of the election, johnson. corbyn was simply unelectable, and i saw that on the doorstep. labor to my core, my dad will turn in hi grave, but i can t vote for you, not even when you have a good local candidate. my theory is when you present voters with clarity or murkiness, if you wanted a vote for brexit, you voted for the conservative party. if you didn t, do you corbyn
and i saw that on the doorstep. corbin was simply unelectable. people saying i m labor to my core, my dad will turn in his grave, but i can t vote for you, not even when you have a good local candidate. my theory is when you present voters with clarity or murkiness, if you wanted a vote for brexit, it was clear what you voted for, the conservative party. if you didn t want brexit, what were you meant to do? corbyn himself was of two minds. it wasn t should you vote liberal democrats, everything was money on one side and clear for boris johnson. yep. essentially you can see it as a vote for certainty and sovereignty. because johnson got an awful lot of the people who had voted for brexit. they now flipped to tories because i agree with you, corbyn was unpalatablunpalatable, but o
he continues. do you see legal problems for him here? this is incredible for so many reasons. giuliani is not a federal employee. he doesn t operate under any of the federal ethics laws. he s just off freelancing for the president in a foreign country, doing work we would normally expect maybe the justice department to be doing or some other legitimate government agency. so that i think is problematic. the source of giuliani s payment always has remained a mystery. we know from the new york times story today that the government didn t disclose any sort of free legal work, and yet he s not paying giuliani. so the question is who is? we know he was working with lev parnas who received at least a $1 million payment from russian sources, so there s a lot of murkiness there. the real question, though, ari, is would this justice department hold giuliani accountable for wrongdoing if in fact that evidence came to light in the
obviously mr. giuliani is unbowed by this investigation as he continues. do you see legal problems for him here? this is incredible for so many reasons. giuliani is not a federal employee. he doesn t operate under any of the federal ethics laws. he s just off freelancing for the president in a foreign country, doing work we would normally expect maybe the justice department to be doing or some other legitimate government agency. so that i think is problematic. the source of giuliani s payment always has remained a mystery. we know from the new york times story today that the government didn t disclose any sort of free legal work, and yet he s not paying giuliani. so the question is who is? we know he was working with lev parnas who received at least a $1 million payment from russian sources, so there s a lot of murkiness there. the real question, though, ari, is would this justice department hold giuliani accountable for
brain at the white house sits down. they are not talking about we ve got a lot of evidence against this, this is going to be tough. they are talking about we are just going to dismiss all this as partisan. we are going to say the president did nothing wrong. the aid got to ukraine, no harm no foul. and they re going to talk about the president was right to pursue this investigation because, and then they re going to put up whatever they can put up to show all the sort of questions and murkiness around burisma. and obviously investigators have looked at this, they haven t found anything. giuliani s with a prosecutor, a former prosecutor in ukraine right now who, you know, was removed because he wasn t investigating corruption. so this is really through that political kaleidoscope right now, and they are going to be presenting a case through the very pro-trump point of view. and i get that from steve bannon who s like a fighting this with a little podcast.