brain at the white house sits down. they are not talking about we ve got a lot of evidence against this, this is going to be tough. they are talking about we are just going to dismiss all this as partisan. we are going to say the president did nothing wrong. the aid got to ukraine, no harm no foul. and they re going to talk about the president was right to pursue this investigation because, and then they re going to put up whatever they can put up to show all the sort of questions and murkiness around burisma. and obviously investigators have looked at this, they haven t found anything. giuliani s with a prosecutor, a former prosecutor in ukraine right now who, you know, was removed because he wasn t investigating corruption. so this is really through that political kaleidoscope right now, and they are going to be presenting a case through the very pro-trump point of view. and i get that from steve bannon who s like a fighting this with a little podcast.
but at the same time news outlets have said there wasn t corruption. there wasn t a quid pro quo of joe biden doing something for hunter biden. right. when you drill into what actually happened here, the international community, the ifm, the eu were all calling for this ukrainian prosecutor to be removed because he wasn t investigating corruption. joe biden has said that as well. but with republicans muddying the water and putting out all sorts of narratives, you can forgive people were getting confused and getting drawn into this. that said, even peter swietser had an op-ed in the new york times today that said hunter biden didn t do anything wrong, but maybe that should be wrong in the future perhaps. but right now it was completely legal. yeah. it s not wrong. that s key. what is the appearance of it? the appearance is something else entirely. it s not illegal, but the appearance is something else entirely. stand by. biden s opponent bernie sanders slowing down his campaig