November 25th has two new ones and they were provided at my request. And we have a december 3rd, alternative special mix that was combined with a combination of the director. So those are the origins of the document. Right. And the mixes. For the purpose of the motion and the second, i believe that the maker is speaking about the december 3rd memo in the alternative special mix giving direction for three scenarios under the hedge funds. One being a fund to fund, one being inhouse and one being a mix to see how the numbers fall. Is that accurate . That is accurate. Im reading into your comments that you didnt expect the Due Diligence on staffs part to be between 30 and 60 days but you had something less in mind although im not sure if there was a specific date, so for the sake of the motion. For the sake of the motion, i will yield to our director, he knows how long it will take to get the data in terms of time span. I would yield to him for the data. We are confident we can have the da
Request. And we have a december 3rd, alternative special mix that was combined with a combination of the director. So those are the origins of the document. Right. And the mixes. For the purpose of the motion and the second, i believe that the maker is speaking about the december 3rd memo in the alternative special mix giving direction for three scenarios under the hedge funds. One being a fund to fund, one being inhouse and one being a mix to see how the numbers fall. Is that accurate . That is accurate. Im reading into your comments that you didnt expect the Due Diligence on staffs part to be between 30 and 60 days but you had something less in mind although im not sure if there was a specific date, so for the sake of the motion. For the sake of the motion, i will yield to our director, he knows how long it will take to get the data in terms of time span. I would yield to him for the data. We are confident we can have the data for the february board meeting. At the time we will propo
Approximately 10 years ago, our investment and policy and beliefs is in our books. Thats what answers many of your questions about who we are and what we believe in and what we are trying the do here. Thats also a public document. I appreciate Margaret Young who asked a lot of questions. I definitely want to answer those questions to prove to you why we are trying to prove our active allocation process for better returns to keep active employers contributions down and to get the citys contributions down so they will have more money whether its for employees and all the programs that this city is trying to do for the citizens of San Francisco. Thats what this allocation process is really all about. You want more time, lets take it. Vicepresident . Thank you very much. My question is through the chair to commissioners bridges, you specifically say that your proposal or the proposal is absent data points. Im just curious if you can expand a little bit about what the type of data you are l
You basically the target of our return and what the value and the return will be in the marketplace. Thats what im looking for. I will do a little bit of clean up here. First on the new allocation mixes that we have. There are two of them. I will put them by date. November 25th has two new ones and they were provided at my request. And we have a december 3rd, alternative special mix that was combined with a combination of the director. So those are the origins of the document. Right. And the mixes. For the purpose of the motion and the second, i believe that the maker is speaking about the december 3rd memo in the alternative special mix giving direction for three scenarios under the hedge funds. One being a fund to fund, one being inhouse and one being a mix to see how the numbers fall. Is that accurate . That is accurate. Im reading into your comments that you didnt expect the Due Diligence on staffs part to be between 30 and 60 days but you had something less in mind although im not
Also an issue in San Francisco where the way the legislation that cited how mcds could be permitted in the city has created zones that, you know, parts of the city called the green zone where mcds seem to congregate or can only congregate and other parts of the city where they arent. So were seeing theres access in some parts of the city and theres clustering where that access is available and the clustering also has some neighborhood impacts. And theres parts of the city where there isnt any access or limited access, you know, to no access at all to medical cannabis and just wondering what your thoughts are about what role you would play and what would be the major considerations on how you would consider mcd issues coming before the board of appeals. Ultimately marijuana is going to be legalized in this country. Its silly that it hasnt been. It becomes a neighborhood issue. To listen to the thoughts of all neighbors and find balance if their feeling is that cannabis dispensaries are