millions of men in this country will have watched pornography at some time, have watched pornography at some time, we have watched pornography at some time, we can have a whole debate about time, we can have a whole debate about pornography more generally at no time, about pornography more generally at no time, but doing that, watching pornography in the workplace and particularly in front of women can come particularly in front of women can come across, even if it wasn t intended come across, even if it wasn t intended to buy this mp, and he says it wasn t, intended to buy this mp, and he says it wasn t, as intended to buy this mp, and he says it wasn t, as a threatening, so there it wasn t, as a threatening, so there is it wasn t, as a threatening, so there is a it wasn t, as a threatening, so there is a law, jess phillips has done there is a law, jess phillips has done a there is a law, jess phillips has done a huge amount for women in her career done a huge
groundwork for this decision to push on with the groundwork for this decision to push on with the jury trial. but win, lose on with the jury trial. but win, lose or on with the jury trial. but win, lose or draw, the queen has 70 years on the lose or draw, the queen has 70 years on the throne, her diamond jubilee. sorry, iget on the throne, her diamond jubilee. sorry, i get my numbers denrocrat jubilee. sorry, i get my numbers democrat anniversaries wrong! the platinum democrat anniversaries wrong! the platinum jubilee, apologies, your majesty platinum jubilee, apologies, your majesty. the platinum jubilee and this will majesty. the platinum jubilee and this willjust be horrible! it s salacious, titillating in the worst possible salacious, titillating in the worst possible way. i don t mean about the possible way. idon t mean about the crimes possible way. i don t mean about the crimes committed against the victims. crimes committed against the victims. i crimes c
this is intriguinintriguing. according to this new reporting from isikoff, there s nothing any committee might do on the issue of obstruction of justice that might get in the way of what mueller is doing now. because mueller is done with everything he might want to do related to obstruction of justice? or mueller isn t pursuing anything on obstruction of justice? i mean that s woe if true as they say. that s remarkable. in this case there s a lot of potential obstruction of justice. and you will remember that in the impeachment articles against both president bill clinton and president richard nixon, obstruction of justice was front and center in terms of what presidents were held accountable for when charged with high climbs and mi crimes and misdemeanor. this raises a lot of interesting questions as to what s going on with this investigation into the president. but it also means you re definitely going to have a very busy week in the news. there s a lot of these documents