truthful or thoughtful things that are not in the narrative that the left is trying to push and their voices are silent sometimes permanently. so this is what s wrongsont with social media. us no way ove no rights. mike had no way of knowing what he put out there was going to get him suspended and not able to speak on this important topic and this really needsch to change. tucker , there s so many things wrong with this picture that really limit our speech and the end result, tucker , is make people like you and mee think twice before we say s truthful things on social media for fear of not being able to say the next truthful thing.eal. and that s not healthy. well, it s so unhealthy, by thee way. p it makes people paranoid and afraid and it gives rise to conspiracy theories because clamping down on speech always doeshe. e why why not let people speak and the consenting adults who choose our leaders in this quote democracy can decide for themselves who sde right on the basis of whateve
exploitative and they seizedas on it together and quickly in a way that made clear that their concern or sadness for the victims was a completee pretense. they instantly weaponizes that before anything was known . anyone who shows no reverence in the face of death should make us nervous. it s a sign of ruthlessness and bad character. i thinkthin anyone s death any place i believe that i need youe to glenn greenwald, thank you so much. thanks, tucker . so it was the usual activists who use the murders in buffaloit over a weekend to attack their political opponents, including as you just heard, this channel on twitter. mike davis at the article threer project pointed that is quote disgusting and insane to exploit this tragedy. twitter suspended him thi for pointing that out. soso someone who said actually e shouldn t jump to quick and dirty partisan conclusions from a mass murderer was banned from saying that by twitter. so this tells you a lot. let that sink in for a moment.
tucker ? because it s human beingshu treating human beings the worst . but yet times i m again pro-life individuals a go out., they try and make the case for life. they were willing to takeom this verbale beating, verbal harassment because you know, someone who suffers more than that pro-life individual out on the streets is the preborn childeebo. in the pro that is what we re fighting forl in the pro-life movement every single child lost to abortion is violated. they are dismembered and poisoned and starved of nutrition. and so that s why theseat proke lifersep keep going out trying o make the case, keep trying to have the debate that anger, i that vitriol is not going tosha change anyone s or mind. but yet we on the pro-life movement are still showing upo- we re trying to serve themth education. i mean, listen, some ofof the things that were just said, they re not they re not even medically accurate. rerepli these people need a lesn in science and prenatal development, embryology pve
with these pro-abortion, you know, women to say, look, we ven got to find some common ground here. these employers should not be paying you to kill b your childe payi. no man is put in that position in order to succeed here we need to take c care of women and the pro-life movement. you know, listen, if we re going to have this summer of rage, tucker , then we re going to have a summer of service. d as my o friend in the pro-life movement, chuck donovan said, we re going to a summer of arpport. we re going to continue to support women and moms and createe goi innovative waysp make sure that we arere represented, that we are taking care of, that we are not toldur we have to end the life of oured child in order to succeed. and just like you said, i mean, there s something dark aboutme the way that the left isnt pursuing their arguments right now. t it a is abortion at all costs at any point in pregnancy for any reason. and no one canha question that . you know, we as the pro-lifeto are wi
we cannot prosper in aro globala order led by russia and china. your idea what you re talking about then crenshaw no. but the point is anyone who disagrees with dan crenshaw is pro russia frankly. well, frankly, crenshaw is attempting to deflect from answering obvious questions like why the concern over ukraine s borders and no concern about the border ofas your own state, texas.. that s a fair question. not for russia. it s in fact pro-american. tulsi gabbard is pro-american,n,oy a lifelong democrat former presidential candidate. we re always grateful to have her join us tonighter. tulsi gabbard, thanks so much for coming on . so if you wereer in the house a still you left less left after the end of last cyclend. but if you were still there, you i don t think you d be ablee to say a single word that being denounced as pro russia, which is a problem for democracy. i think the real question here,e tucker , that we re all askinge these leaders in washington is what s the rush?