last night asked that investigators regain access to 125 documents found in that search of mar-a-lago. that is part of the extraordinary appeal to cannon s order which politico puts like this, it aims to a full-throated rebuke of the ruling by cannon, a trump appointee who was confirmed to a seat after trump s defeat in the 2020 election. prosecutors used the filing to describe her ruling as a danger to national security and one ignorant to the counterintelligence work and lacking in an understanding of the complexities of executive privilege. all of it and the bid to continue to use the classified documents from mar-a-lago in the investigation amounts to a bold gamut from doj. once again, from politico, quote, they re going forward with an appeal despite the risk of cementing an awful precedent. we re getting an even worse ruling from an appeals court dominated by trump appointees and they re daring cannon to double down on analysts that legal analysts on the right and left
expose him as an expert level grifter, but there s something at the level of the psyche that s speaking to this sense of grievance and this sense of resentment that trumpism that trumpism attracts, and so i wonder how the lincoln project will get at that, even as they expose this grifting component of trumpism itself. sure. rick, you want to show some cards there? sure. of course. you know, eddie, first off, i couldn t love you more now that you re also a d&d guy. but i will say this. what we ve been doing for a long time is splitting off small amounts of trump s vote. we all it the bannon line. it was named by steve bannon. he said, if they split off 3% to 8% of the gop, trump can t win. we said, hold my beer. so, we re splitting off fractions at a time in the effort to weaken his base, weaken his fund-raising, to disrupt his operations, to make it harder and harder for him to be the only fish in the pond because, you know, we view donald trump still as the presumptive nominee
what then? because it s not just trump. trump is a kind of cynic you know, he s a kind of representation of a much deeper, problematic, that you ve just laid out. that is to say, he s not we re not going to remove trumpism by removing trump from the playing field. i just don t believe that s the case. we re going to have to deal with what s at the heart of the problem, and at the heart of the problem is this feeling, at least i believe so, and i think the data backs me up on this, the feeling that a certain demographic in this country believes that they are under cultural and demographic threat. so, trump could be the object of a certain kind of leftist plot to keep him from running for office, but that s not going to resolve the problem at the heart of the polity, that there are all of these people who believe what he represents, because in fact, he represents them. you always make the political profound, eddie. let me ask you this, though, as a political matter, should they pur
measure of just the hundred classified documents. there s some reporting, charlie, i want to read about what it appears to be the least legally sophisticated argument for people like me. she plain, straight up didn t understand what executive privilege was or is, and it sounds like trump wants his modified concern path back, he can have it and is the washington. reporter:ing. with less than two years, jinl cannon does not have a record record to review while presenting untested questions to shield sensitive communications from disclosure may be applied to past occupants of the white house in conflict with their successors. former senor russ feingold who leads the constitution society which closely tracks judicial
what beenes provide the department of justice? as witnesses finally tell the truth, there will be witnesses who tell the truth of how this committee was working. it s such a good point, frank, and doj shouldn t be criticized for going for the low-hanging criminal fruit first, as carol is saying you want to argue that the rule of law should apply to everyone evenly, sometimes it s easier to apply the rule of law of handling of classified documents and in this case, it was trump supporters. the other side of is that the evidence is so clear and that conduct so brazen that the big picture that you pull back and see is a bunch of people at trump s direction acting like criminals all day on every front, scramming their supporters for the wall or the super pac, lying about what they were taking from the white house