last night asked that investigators regain access to 125 documents found in that search of mar-a-lago. that is part of the extraordinary appeal to cannon s order which politico puts like this, it aims to a full-throated rebuke of the ruling by cannon, a trump appointee who was confirmed to a seat after trump s defeat in the 2020 election. prosecutors used the filing to describe her ruling as a danger to national security and one ignorant to the counterintelligence work and lacking in an understanding of the complexities of executive privilege. all of it and the bid to continue to use the classified documents from mar-a-lago in the investigation amounts to a bold gamut from doj. once again, from politico, quote, they re going forward with an appeal despite the risk of cementing an awful precedent. we re getting an even worse ruling from an appeals court dominated by trump appointees and they re daring cannon to double down on analysts that legal analysts on the right and left
expose him as an expert level grifter, but there s something at the level of the psyche that s speaking to this sense of grievance and this sense of resentment that trumpism that trumpism attracts, and so i wonder how the lincoln project will get at that, even as they expose this grifting component of trumpism itself. sure. rick, you want to show some cards there? sure. of course. you know, eddie, first off, i couldn t love you more now that you re also a d&d guy. but i will say this. what we ve been doing for a long time is splitting off small amounts of trump s vote. we all it the bannon line. it was named by steve bannon. he said, if they split off 3% to 8% of the gop, trump can t win. we said, hold my beer. so, we re splitting off fractions at a time in the effort to weaken his base, weaken his fund-raising, to disrupt his operations, to make it harder and harder for him to be the only fish in the pond because, you know, we view donald trump still as the presumptive nominee