Agree with them . We have not received a copy of those measures. Okay. When was the last time you had a meeting with the folks in the Marsh Community . Good evening, project sponsor. We met with the marsh directly after the dr meeting. We proceed actively went over and investigated some issues that they had on the property, some roof drainage issues and we also retained their sound consultant to come up with a report that should be floating around here with the Planning Department somewhere. We didnt find any issues with the sound. The building formally was a nightclub. Back in 86 and 87 he received some complaints and on two occasions he pulled permits to do the soundproofing. All the complaints we heard tonight about the fees ability of the marsh is groundless because there is no reason they can do that now. There is open space in the back. There is Large Service area for the restaurant where the recycling goes on at night. That does not interfere with the performance now. The condit
Mitigated nasdaq on characteristic and quality and land use and other topic. The mitigated nag dakt that it could be prominent in scale. However a new Larger Development is not in and of itself find the project would not substantially create visual quality. With regard to land use, the project would be consistent with the pattern of development that is supported by the valencia street which contains a range of building styles and heights that awe allow for larger buildings on the corner. A related claim by the appellant is that the mitigated nag dak does not address the consistency with the general plan. Then properly analyzed the extent to which the project is with any applicable policy. Adopt for the purpose of avoiding and mitigating an environmental effect the ceqa. The conflict to the extent that it would cause a significant effect. The degree that it has the potential to policy adopted to environmental effects have been considered in our analysis. As part of the departments revie
Been under taken to respond to noise concerns. A couple questions, what do you response to the proposed mitigation measures that the marsh has presented . Do you agree with them . We have not received a copy of those measures. Okay. When was the last time you had a meeting with the folks in the Marsh Community . Good evening, project sponsor. We met with the marsh directly after the dr meeting. We proceed actively went over and investigated some issues that they had on the property, some roof drainage issues and we also retained their sound consultant to come up with a report that should be floating around here with the Planning Department somewhere. We didnt find any issues with the sound. The building formally was a nightclub. Back in 86 and 87 he received some complaints and on two occasions he pulled permits to do the soundproofing. All the complaints we heard tonight about the fees ability of the marsh is groundless because there is no reason they can do that now. There is open sp
Agree with them . We have not received a copy of those measures. Okay. When was the last time you had a meeting with the folks in the Marsh Community . Good evening, project sponsor. We met with the marsh directly after the dr meeting. We proceed actively went over and investigated some issues that they had on the property, some roof drainage issues and we also retained their sound consultant to come up with a report that should be floating around here with the Planning Department somewhere. We didnt find any issues with the sound. The building formally was a nightclub. Back in 86 and 87 he received some complaints and on two occasions he pulled permits to do the soundproofing. All the complaints we heard tonight about the fees ability of the marsh is groundless because there is no reason they can do that now. There is open space in the back. There is Large Service area for the restaurant where the recycling goes on at night. That does not interfere with the performance now. The condit
Surprised. I havent heard anyone claim that the level of development was expected so thats a first one in terms of what i hear. Im also really worried about the analysis around noise with respect to the marsh. Can you talk a little bit more about that because you are talking about a very Cultural Institution that is central to the identity of this neighborhood and not just valencia corridor but the entire mission neighborhood. Im really worried about the, i dont know that enough attention has been given or certainly not articulated to the very legitimate concerns that were raised by the various testimony around that. For this, i would like to thank urn thinks over to tonya singer from the Planning Department. The m and d analyze different noise and impact wrap to the marsh. We looked at how construction noise would affect the marsh theatre. Its regulated by the noise ordinance with very specific terms regarding when construction is permitted. As part of to discretionary review. The con