Significant effects related to changes and circumstances and noise impacts. On the first point the appellant results that it would impact with many buildings in the area. Mitigated nasdaq on characteristic and quality and land use and other topic. The mitigated nag dakt that it could be prominent in scale. However a new Larger Development is not in and of itself find the project would not substantially create visual quality. With regard to land use, the project would be consistent with the pattern of development that is supported by the valencia street which contains a range of building styles and heights that awe allow for larger buildings on the corner. A related claim by the appellant is that the mitigated nag dak does not address the consistency with the general plan. Then properly analyzed the extent to which the project is with any applicable policy. Adopt for the purpose of avoiding and mitigating an environmental effect the ceqa. The conflict to the extent that it would cause a
Mitigated nasdaq on characteristic and quality and land use and other topic. The mitigated nag dakt that it could be prominent in scale. However a new Larger Development is not in and of itself find the project would not substantially create visual quality. With regard to land use, the project would be consistent with the pattern of development that is supported by the valencia street which contains a range of building styles and heights that awe allow for larger buildings on the corner. A related claim by the appellant is that the mitigated nag dak does not address the consistency with the general plan. Then properly analyzed the extent to which the project is with any applicable policy. Adopt for the purpose of avoiding and mitigating an environmental effect the ceqa. The conflict to the extent that it would cause a significant effect. The degree that it has the potential to policy adopted to environmental effects have been considered in our analysis. As part of the departments revie
Effect to the architectural style and significant plans and policies and why the project would not have impact in Historic Resources and why the project would not result in significant effects related to changes and circumstances and noise impacts. On the first point the appellant results that it would impact with many buildings in the area. Mitigated nasdaq on characteristic and quality and land use and other topic. The mitigated nag dakt that it could be prominent in scale. However a new Larger Development is not in and of itself find the project would not substantially create visual quality. With regard to land use, the project would be consistent with the pattern of development that is supported by the valencia street which contains a range of building styles and heights that awe allow for larger buildings on the corner. A related claim by the appellant is that the mitigated nag dak does not address the consistency with the general plan. Then properly analyzed the extent to which t
Historic resources and why the project would not result in significant effects related to changes and circumstances and noise impacts. On the first point the appellant results that it would impact with many buildings in the area. Mitigated nasdaq on characteristic and quality and land use and other topic. The mitigated nag dakt that it could be prominent in scale. However a new Larger Development is not in and of itself find the project would not substantially create visual quality. With regard to land use, the project would be consistent with the pattern of development that is supported by the valencia street which contains a range of building styles and heights that awe allow for larger buildings on the corner. A related claim by the appellant is that the mitigated nag dak does not address the consistency with the general plan. Then properly analyzed the extent to which the project is with any applicable policy. Adopt for the purpose of avoiding and mitigating an environmental effect
Billboards coming soon. Im against the values that i have personally brought me here to San Francisco and made me love the city. I hope that you will go with the fans of the marsh and the neighborhood. Thank you. Im ready. Its on this computer. Its ready. My name is elizabeth. I have lived for decades in 94110 and i live on hill street. What you have heard on the documents is that this building is not a good fit for our neighborhood. This development is based on lives and you should know about that. The first lie is that we are well served by transit. You can walk a half block for 2 feet to a munis line that doesnt serve well. According to the system wide on time performance which is less than 60 percent. The 49 and the j are all lower as you can see on this chart that comes from sf mta. All three of these lines are lower than the 60 percent. Does anybody in this room think that less than 60 percent is a good on time rate . Is it good for you . Would it be a good rate for your children