City administration active process first. Actually in chapter four 1 it doesnt require the city producing process but in that chapter the relieve is limited to the City Attorneys feeds. When is what were talking about. Supervisor kim is proposing what the same penalties as limited for the nonprofit to injunctive relief and attorneys fees. And so help to clarify for me in terms of the exist law youre saying it is already in there then why is this amendment necessary for whats in there vs. Whats been proposed. The difference in the current code a nonprofit would have to wait to go through the entire city process before it finally and so you right now for housing nonprofit to be able to file a private School Private right of action through the city process. And the director has to determine a violation. So what commissioner adams is proechtd in the amendment is a new thing in terms of saying that a city housing nonprofit did not have to go through the process only file a complaint and 45
City would allow them to operate n and open their doors before paying a licensing fee before paying a permitting fee now extrapolate that to whats happening today, we have a finding by the 0 treasurer of the city and county of San Francisco that Million Dollars dollars 25 million about is owed to the taxpayers of San Francisco and yet as we are deciding whether to provide an additional benefit to this corporation let me say i believe we need to legalize home sharing that it has a rule to play in San Francisco but it would be wrong in my view for us to create a separate set of rules for one group of people and a separate set for another we were here not too long ago when we saw the developers on a major transportation project that were trying to get out of their obligations under that project beyond how we can say that they should meet their obligations with respect to that issue and say were not going to delve into the money that is owed leave that up to the treasurer we crafted the la
Words middleincome and the rest is included. Thank you, supervisor ms. Balboa park is there additional clarification to what supervisor mar said. Adopting Marilyn Burns ill told clarify the language is cultural drafted the language is regarding is not housing developed or rehabbed with the Financial Assistance with the city and county of San Francisco we will definitely want further classification in committee ideally or here as to what that indicates right now i believe that includes such things as the Million Dollars contract and potentially open the building loans theres many types of loans and grant that falls into the description of Financial Assistance so we want clarification on those terms so let me try to that about this for example, prop c has the trust fund on mission as i mentioned or small site acquisition and erect types of small buildings we were considering not the broader expansion of massy or different types of earthquake preparedness type of improvements to home im w
Sure their heating something up its more than vapor but odd vapor a type of smoke so it could be incarnate incarnate begins i feel bad for the young come up that invested their money but its too bad it is probably not a real good choice on a block that has bad things like 9 massage polarized and the mcd and lots of Liquor Stores and restaurants you, you wouldnt want to go into its not appealing its too bad it hadnt improved maybe it will in the future. Commissioner hillis. I have a couple of questions for staff so we had a list of other vapor shops theres 25 in the city i havent seen a mcd. Theres the first condominium conversion for a paraphernalia i cant City Attorney speak for the department where it is i know i have other requests following this one i think in 2012 i believe 2008 the board of supervisors passes an ordinance that requests the cu and in 2010 there was a small amendment to that so i dont know why this is the first. Yeah, because many of new i live close but there was
Amendment and want to know more about them i want to take a moment to thank etch that has orchid that the legislation thank you, president chiu for bringing it thats is an interesting pope piece its gal knitted aloof people its critically complex issue but beginning to address a very critical step in combating San Francisco affordability issue ive spent many hours in Committee Hearings and gotten thousands thank you thousands of emails plus phone numbers on phone calls on this topic its been interesting to have conversations around the city of San Francisco people are will definitely paying attention and are concerned or dialed in on the issue i believe we need to step forward and regulate this activity to protect our city rent control Housing Stock awhile afforded hosts that need the money that many others are in need of and continue the shortterm rentals under a limited circumstance i believe that the legislation is really come a very long way after many amendments and im grateful th