The language that captures the residential language and not have it as expansive as i said. Id like recommend right now that we added a little bit of tightening on the occupancy its clear its income restrife unit thats an ongoing restriction so some in district units are not restricted for the life of the building but for a cafe time that might go further to limiting the universe of unit were talking about i think we could provide for language in committee that helps to clarify the terms as to what youre sdrip. Thank you dot City Attorneys have more comments in terms of technical words or adjustments that need to be made that. Not at this time well be happy to look at the ones that are substantive or material well refer back to the planning commission. Thank you at this time i want to open up the discussion to the colleagues regarding the rest of the amendments president chiu. Supervisor mar excluding the inlaw units. I have a problem ill explain the intent of our legislation was to cl
Where it is standing behind the principles in the need to protect our communities converting residential apartment into shortterm rentals only exacerbates the housing crisis prohibiting shortterm rentals in a unit for 5 years following an ellis act veeths support our longstanding policy to preserve the limited Housing Resources we have the amendment im introducing specifically says that a unit that has been subjected to a ellis act eviction within a 5 year period would not quality if the eviction occurred on november 1st, 2012, ive got copies of any amendment with respect to the unpaid taxes and with respect to the second item im going to ask the City Attorney the best way to proceed ive suggested language what is the advise. City attorney and john gibner, deputy City Attorney. So i believe at some point in the discussion probably makes sense for my colleagues merlin or myself to talk about the amendments to refer to planning are which which have them requires another hearing at the bo
Or before that Committee Hearing provided the advice regarding the issue we suggest during the last two weeks weve looked electro the ordinances that is preponderance of the evidence and worked with Supervisors Office particularly supervisor chius office and had clean up amendments well ask the board to adapt may be the First Amendment youll vote on supervisor chiu has a copy of the amendment but essentially theyve fixed the number one issues that came up in the past amendment they clarify that hosting platforms can be liable for violations of the notice requirement in the ordinance and in the administrative hearing and one of the amendments that supervisor farrell proposed today requiring the finally the Homeowners Association to my unit covered by the Homeowners Association including the that neighborhood Homeowners Association. With that, colleagues a motion. Ill move the technical amendment and great supervisor wiener with that, do we need a roefrlt that was supervisor chiu. I was
That we added a little bit of tightening on the occupancy its clear its income restrife unit thats an ongoing restriction so some in district units are not restricted for the life of the building but for a cafe time that might go further to limiting the universe of unit were talking about i think we could provide for language in committee that helps to clarify the terms as to what youre sdrip. Thank you dot City Attorneys have more comments in terms of technical words or adjustments that need to be made that. Not at this time well be happy to look at the ones that are substantive or material well refer back to the planning commission. Thank you at this time i want to open up the discussion to the colleagues regarding the rest of the amendments president chiu. Supervisor mar excluding the inlaw units. I have a problem ill explain the intent of our legislation was to cloud unit that are emptied with public dollars and inlaw units are part of the private buildings and private units and th
Words middleincome and the rest is included. Thank you, supervisor ms. Balboa park is there additional clarification to what supervisor mar said. Adopting Marilyn Burns ill told clarify the language is cultural drafted the language is regarding is not housing developed or rehabbed with the Financial Assistance with the city and county of San Francisco we will definitely want further classification in committee ideally or here as to what that indicates right now i believe that includes such things as the Million Dollars contract and potentially open the building loans theres many types of loans and grant that falls into the description of Financial Assistance so we want clarification on those terms so let me try to that about this for example, prop c has the trust fund on mission as i mentioned or small site acquisition and erect types of small buildings we were considering not the broader expansion of massy or different types of earthquake preparedness type of improvements to home im w