conditionally permitted elsewhere. we feel that is largely consistent with the nc3 districts. that s our recommendation before you. the resolution that is attached to this memorandum describes that we are recommending approval of modification of just this portion of the ordinance, this case report does talk about a few other amendments but it would just be conforming amendments to implement the policies i just described. we are recommending, and then we recommend that you do tall the remain of the street frontage. i have checked with secretary staff and there is room on that calendar. president miguel: thank you. i have two speaker cards, tom radulovich and marilyn anene. thanks, commissioners. key have the overhead? would that be possible? great. just a few things. first of all in the recommendation that s before you, i really appreciate your staff, after coming here last week, taking a second look at this. i think it s a great set of uses and very inappropriate for the
i think it s a great set of uses and very inappropriate for the rc district. i think we came up with a great 21st century solution to the problem and thanks to everybody who worked on that. and i would fully commend it to you, and hopefully to the full board. we will put the uses behind us at least for the time being, we are ok with the continuance, as well. i think it s fantastic and tremendously important to the city. it s important for a few reasons, we would love your staff to take a closer look at two issues, one is the issue of what s called a snout house. i have an illustration here. this is a snout house. a snout house is a house that sticks its garage out toward the street and all the human-oriented parts of the building gets pulled back. very takic of post world war ii construction. we don t have any in san francisco. they tend to have a garage that is flush with the interest facade. the current code does permit you to turn an existing building into a snout house. t
policies i just described. we are recommending, and then we recommend that you do tall the remain of the street frontage. i have checked with secretary staff and there is room on that calendar. president miguel: thank you. i have two speaker cards, tom radulovich and marilyn anene. thanks, commissioners. key have the overhead? would that be possible? great. just a few things. first of all in the recommendation that s before you, i really appreciate your staff, after coming here last week, taking a second look at this. i think it s a great set of uses and very inappropriate for the rc district. i think we came up with a great 21st century solution to the problem and thanks to everybody who worked on that. and i would fully commend it to you, and hopefully to the full board. we will put the uses behind us at least for the time being, we are ok with the continuance, as well. i think it s fantastic and tremendously important to the city. it s important for a few reasons, we w
good afternoon, commissioners, thanks for your time and consideration on this we agree with the staff s recommendation to work on this ordinance and hold off on any board action until after the commission has a chance to review it january 15th, we would like to thank you for your support of the predecessor of this ordinance that created access street frontage uses and look forward to staff coming up with similar street frontage controls for the residential districts. i will save a lengthier philosophical discussion for january at that commission meeting. ann marie rogers, again, just to go through in detail what the implications of this were to be, if we were to use the nc3 districts as a reference point. we would take any use principally permitted on the ground floor and if they were permitted there, then we would allow them to be principally permitted below in the rc districts, similarly, if conditional use was required for use in the nc3 districts, it wou