I remember you when you were mayor when we visited stanford and my question really relates to their relationship in piggybacks on your rick question the relationship of schools and generalpurpose government. In stanford you are one of them a oral pioneers in pushing the kinds of relationships that you just discussed. My question relates to this philosophy particularly in light of the profound demographic changes. Have you been able to take the kinds of initiatives at the state level bringing in the department of social services and juvenile justice etc. And breaking down the traditional isolation of schools from general purpose government . Yes and no. We made some progress but not enough. Some of that affect structural change and i go back to Early Childhood education. We created an office of the Early Childhood. We took operations out of four different departments and put them in one office to be housed within the department of education but now we have one operation concentrating on
On capitol hill. Why . Because we will have reached Critical Mass. I think that is where we are going. You have to prove the point. You have to have Critical Mass in order to move the market and that is where we are going to be this next year. This is for both of you gentlemen. With cable news, with whether it is on the left report right or the right there is a dialogue and tends it would seem to perpetuate that polarization. When do you say to an elected elected he figures when they have to go official when they have to go back and face a constituency. What do you say to the elected official . How will you convince that elected official that forging the compromises is not going to cost them their next election because of the polarization and the perpetration of that by both the left and the right . Well, that is an excellent question. For those who arent familiar with my states politics, as the senator mentioned Richard Luger served for 36 years in the United States senate in indiana.
A huge factor in driving to irans stable rating. What arabs knew back in 2004, who was the winner in iraq . Guess it comes out the winner in the arab world . Iran. In 2006 it was even higher. In 2008 he was even higher. In 2012 the clothing iran was the big winner. Because iraq was defeated, Saddam Hussein was the biggest nemesis to iran was defeated, and iran was now emboldened in their broader region. It goes beyond that though. They see irans role in bahrain, which some think here in the west is just a matter of saudi propaganda but Arab Public Opinion thinks iran is involved. Whether it is or not the perception mom tells me this all done. She says it doesnt matter, people think you are doing something. Take a look at what youre doing. It doesnt matter whether not its real or not. Public opinion believes it is real. And the nail in the coffin in Arab Public Opinion for iran is series. 17 of the 20 countries that we have surveyed now believe that irans role in iraq, and syria is deci
Research combining genetic and medical records with genealogical records provides a unique perspective that benefits medicine globally. A recent publication from University of Utah Health identified a gene responsible for atrial fibrillation in many Utah families.
How Richard Lewontin s (1929-2021) Work Weakened The Case For Race Being A Biological Category swarajyamag.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from swarajyamag.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.