Teachers in mississippi now in quarantine after more than 400 people test positive. A Key White House Coronavirus Task force member joins us live. Abc news exclusive. The former high ranking trump official with harsh words for the president. The president wanted to exploit the department of Homeland Security for his own political purposes. He says what he witnessed the president do was terrifying. Hes now breaking republican ranks and endorsing democratic nominee joe biden. Miles taylor joins us live. Ellens emotional apology as three Top Producers all accused of Sexual Misconductir fre. Ed the talk show host reportedly addresses her staff, apologizes over accusations her show created a toxic work culture, taking on rumors about herself calling them crazy and not true. And the bellas are back. Banks, kendrick, wilson and more reuniting for a perfect new rendition of beyonces hit song. Plus, how theyre pitching in for a good cause. Always great to start the morning with some beautiful m
Always, often, sympathize find that the five year moratorium is putting the burden in the wrong place. One thing i would look for in any further developments that we have is an aggressive pursuit of meaningful and strong remedies that will not overburden neighborhoods and communities but will get ads, especially, the proverbial bad actors that are doing things wrong. Next, systematically. We all look at trying to codify anything into 50 , 70 , or 25 of a facade, what constitutes demolition . We all have problems with it, in part, it encourages people to do their filing so they come in just under. Its all fine. That is really a pretty terrible way to do things. We get something submitted to planning and it meets all of their criteria. If they have, you know, 50 is their standard and it comes in at 49. Low and behold us and as we go and open walls and see what is going on, boy, isnt this surprising . Despite all the things we thought about how dangerous and prone to problems the blind wa
Progress. Aside from that, i would suggest a few things that i would like to see in the legislation. I would like to exempt cosmetic, nonstructural things like cladding from the demo calculations. I would like fines to fit, you know, the crime. I would like things in addition to fines, like process, to weed out bad actors. So we know who they are, we know they are there frequent flyers. We currently do not have a process that codified to disallow them to keep gaming the system, other than fines. I think we can do that through a process. I would like to have the demo calculations and additions to be more targeted to neighborhoods. I know we have resisted that, but really build housing is very different in Bernal Heights than it is in balboa terrace. The consequences of maxing out bulk and height are very different in those. I would encourage us to look at that. I would just end by saying, we in this commission see the most egregious things. That is what bubbles up to the surface. As som
Always, often, sympathize find that the five year moratorium is putting the burden in the wrong place. One thing i would look for in any further developments that we have is an aggressive pursuit of meaningful and strong remedies that will not overburden neighborhoods and communities but will get ads, especially, the proverbial bad actors that are doing things wrong. Next, systematically. We all look at trying to codify anything into 50 , 70 , or 25 of a facade, what constitutes demolition . We all have problems with it, in part, it encourages people to do their filing so they come in just under. Its all fine. That is really a pretty terrible way to do things. We get something submitted to planning and it meets all of their criteria. If they have, you know, 50 is their standard and it comes in at 49. Low and behold us and as we go and open walls and see what is going on, boy, isnt this surprising . Despite all the things we thought about how dangerous and prone to problems the blind wa
Has asked, and what i think we need to answer is this legislation that prohibits the demolition of sound housing . If that is countered to the densification that we need to have for environmental reasons, then are we not just setting ourselves up for failure . Just answering that question, for me, is going to allow us to make progress. Aside from that, i would suggest a few things that i would like to see in the legislation. I would like to exempt cosmetic, nonstructural things like cladding from the demo calculations. I would like fines to fit, you know, the crime. I would like things in addition to fines, like process, to weed out bad actors. So we know who they are, we know they are there frequent flyers. We currently do not have a process that codified to disallow them to keep gaming the system, other than fines. I think we can do that through a process. I would like to have the demo calculations and additions to be more targeted to neighborhoods. I know we have resisted that, but