Says its turning its National Stadium into a hospital and belgium is warning of a tsunami of new cases and socialist candidate luis sad sick claims victory in bolivias president ial rerun paving the way for evermore alice to return. We begin this news hour with what seems like an imminent breakthrough in a long running dispute between the u. S. And sudan President Donald Trump says he is ready to remove khartoum from the u. S. List of states sponsors of terrorism 1st though he says it must pay compensation to u. S. Terror victims and their families this is what he tweeted great news new government of sudan which is making great progress agreed to pay 335 1000000. 00 to us. Terror victims and families once the positive that will lift sudan from the state sponsors of terrorism list a long lasting justice for the American People and the big step for so that. While sudans Prime Minister is expected to make an announcement shortly the money relates to al qaeda attacks on u. S. Embassies in
The sewers, alexey lives in this house, alive in the region of the liver. Well, okay, are there any witnesses . He is a citizen. Zhukov, grigory vitalievich, zhukov, vitaly grigorevich. Vtaly grigorevich, please tell us what happened here, the witnesses can be free. Lets go, i didnt see anything in particular, i was returning home, i live here, suddenly a man stepped towards me, he fastened, fell, lost consciousness, thats all. Thats all, yes, no, then i called the police, the police, but nothing, continue, continue, whats next, but he also said some strange words, i didnt even know what they referred to, maybe he already he was delirious, so some words , the hawk has returned, thats all, its clear, sign the interview report, come here, no, you know, i once signed it on the street, then there were murders. Form and show the witness, and give him a pen, he doesnt have one, where do you say he lived in this house, he s registered, well, lets go see the apartment, lets go, it looks like h
Youll hear argument first this morning in case 151194, packingham versus North Carolina. Mr. Goldberg. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, there are three principal features of North Carolinas law that make it a stark abridgement of the freedom of speech. First, section 2, 2. 5, reaches vast swaths of core First Amendment activity that is totally unrelated to the governments preventive purpose. Mr. Packingham was not accused of communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking to his friends and family about his experience in traffic court. And if today he were to view or respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Second, the law does not operate in some sleepy First Amendment corner. It operates and forbids speech on the very platforms on which americans today are most likely to communicate, to organize for social change, and to petition their government. Third, section 20
Youll hear argument first this morning in case 151194, packingham versus North Carolina. Mr. Goldberg. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, there are three principal features of North Carolinas law that make it a stark abridgement of the freedom of speech. First, section 2, 2. 5, reaches vast swaths of core First Amendment activity that is totally unrelated to the governments preventive purpose. Mr. Packingham was not accused of communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking to his friends and family about his experience in traffic court. And if today he were to view or respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Second, the law does not operate in some sleepy First Amendment corner. It operates and forbids speech on the very platforms on which americans today are most likely to communicate, to organize for social change, and to petition their government. Third, section 20
It reaches the part of the activity that is unrelated to the government preventative purpose. He was not accused of communicating with for viewing the probe while of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking. To view or were respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Occupy the law does not some sleepy First Amendment corner. It is a very platforms on which americans are likely to communicate to organize for social change and to petition their government. Could the state impose that . Your honor, i think they have much more authority to impose this. And limited and i think if you had something as sweeping as this, i dont think they could do that. Justice ginsburg. The most fundamental right is taken away. Some states prohibit sit science from voting. Some states prohibits being bearing arms. Those are constitutional ites. They are different. They are fundamental but they are different. In the case of voting, North Car