Restaurants in its lee are reopening ahead of plan and dates the big part of tourism in kenya how coronavirus is affecting its Wildlife Reserve just. Thank you very much for joining us we begin with some breaking news this hour and a jewish settler has been found guilty of a 2015 arson attack which killed a palestinian toddler and his parents the family were killed after the man fire bombed their home in the village of duma so this is a landmark decision in a case which has become a test of Israeli Security forces treatment of jews and palestinians lets go straight to our correspondent Harry Fawcett at the court in law and israel so a guilty verdict an important decision remind us for us harry how we got to this point today. For us this was one of the most controversial cases of any sort of jewish attacks on palestinians or something that took place in july 25th dream followed a tribe by shooting of a jewish man the prosecutions case was always that these 2 young men one was a minor on
Youll hear argument first this morning in case 151194, packingham versus North Carolina. Mr. Goldberg. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, there are three principal features of North Carolinas law that make it a stark abridgement of the freedom of speech. First, section 2, 2. 5, reaches vast swaths of core First Amendment activity that is totally unrelated to the governments preventive purpose. Mr. Packingham was not accused of communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking to his friends and family about his experience in traffic court. And if today he were to view or respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Second, the law does not operate in some sleepy First Amendment corner. It operates and forbids speech on the very platforms on which americans today are most likely to communicate, to organize for social change, and to petition their government. Third, section 20
Youll hear argument first this morning in case 151194, packingham versus North Carolina. Mr. Goldberg. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, there are three principal features of North Carolinas law that make it a stark abridgement of the freedom of speech. First, section 2, 2. 5, reaches vast swaths of core First Amendment activity that is totally unrelated to the governments preventive purpose. Mr. Packingham was not accused of communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking to his friends and family about his experience in traffic court. And if today he were to view or respond to any of the thousands of twitter messages about his case in this court, that would be a felony. Second, the law does not operate in some sleepy First Amendment corner. It operates and forbids speech on the very platforms on which americans today are most likely to communicate, to organize for social change, and to petition their government. Third, section 20
Good evening. Thank you for coming out to this event. I am one of the coowners of politics and prose. On behalf of our terrific staff, we welcome all of you to the event tonight. A few housekeeping matters. Most of you have been to events, our guest will speak about her book and then we will take questions at the end. We doend. We do you record these events. We also have cspan hear tonight. If you can make it to the microphone we would be grateful because that makes the audio much more enjoyable for those trying to listen to are not actually physically in the space. If you have a phone or other noisemaking device on your person and you could possibly silence it or make it so that it will make noise we would be grateful for that, and lastly at the end of the event if you would not mind holding up your chairs and put them into the side elaine will find books appear. Plenty of copies of front. I think you all know what it looks like. Should be happy to sign at the end appear at the table.
To protect nonconformists of all stripes. The core particularly focused on schools because the case involved a two Elementary School girls. Said because schools are educating the young for citizenship, they must scrupulously protect individual rights if we are not to strangle the free mind at its source and to teach youths to discount important principles of government as mere mere platitudes that you can watch this and other programs on my netbook tv. Org. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] at evening, everyone. Thank you all so much for coming out tonight for this event. I one of the coowners of politics and prose. My husband and coowner, Business Partner brad graham is floating around in the back somewhere and on behalf of our staff we welcome you to the event tonight. A few housekeeping matters before we get started and i think most of you have been to events here, but for anyone who hasnt, our guest will speak about her book and then we will take questions at the