Last month, we predicted that a renewed focus by the SEC on insider trading, MNPI and related internal controls would be one of the Top Ten Regulatory and Litigation Risks for Private.
District court decision. that means for now, a federal mask mandate is not in effect. back with us, barbara mcquade, veteran federal prosecutor and former u.s. attorney for the district of michigan. worked with the doj for the biden transition and is a professor at the university of michigan law school. hey barbara, so the doj believes that the mask mandate is a valid exercise of authority that congress has given the agency to protect public health. so why not just appeal the ruling? why even wait, when we all know that it is causing confusion? this is one of the things that the justice department does. it assesses litigation risks. even if it believes the correct result, that the cdc does have this authority, they have to gauge their likelihood of success. this case was decided out of florida, the appeals court there is the 11th circuit. that is one that is populated by a number of trump appointees and other conservative appointees. and so the worry i think is, if you get an adverse
Concern that followed the trump appointed federal judges decision to rollback the mask mandate on public transportation. tonight, the justice department said that it is waiting for the cdc to weigh in. in a statement, doj wrote quote, if the cdc concludes that a mandatory order remains necessary for the public s health, the department of justice will appeal the district court decision. that means for now, a federal mask mandate is not in effect. back with us, barbara mcquade, veteran federal prosecutor and former u.s. attorney for the district of michigan. worked with the doj for the biden transition and is a professor at the university of michigan law school. hey barbara, so the doj believes that the mask mandate is a valid exercise of authority that congress has given the agency to protect public health. so why not just appeal the ruling? why even wait, when we all know that it is causing confusion? this is one of the things that the justice department does. it assesses litigation
Last month, the SEC proposed new rules under the Advisers Act that, if implemented, would be the most significant enhancement of disclosure obligations for private fund managers since.
Last month, the SEC proposed new rules under the Advisers Act that, if implemented, would be the most significant enhancement of disclosure obligations for private fund managers since the Dodd-Frank Act.