not in may. i was asked by laura by a specific that would meet. the dmd said that they met the certification? yes, sir. in the july time frame. thank you. it s interesting and curious we re talking about hearsay evidence, extraordinary to me that the committee s been able to get as much information as she in direct or hearsay given the obstruction. you gentlemen were both asked by the state department not to appear for your depositions. is that correct? we both received, i believe i received, initially a letter directing me not to appear, and once the committees issued a subpoena i was under legal obligation to appear and i am here today under subpoena. ambassador, were you also asked not to be part of the deposition? i was told by the state department, don t appear under the circumstances, that was in the letter to me, and when i got
issue that would meet the conditionality. the dod did meet, say they met the certification. yes, sir. i think it may have within in the july time frame. thank you. so. it s interesting and curious that we re talking about hearsay evidence, that is extraordinary to me that the committee has been able to get as much information that they had, direct or hearsay, given the obstruction. you gentlemen were both asked by the state department not to appear for your depositions. is that correct? ? we both received i received initially a letter directing me not to appear. and once the committees issued a subpoena, i was under legal obligation to appear and i am here today under subpoena. ambassador, were you also asked not to be part of the deposition? mr. quigley, i was told by the state department don t appear under these circumstances, that was in the letter to me. and when i got the subpoena
cooper. it had not been done by may because i was asked to raise a specific issue that would meet theue conditionality. they did meet the certification? i think itet may have been i the july time frame. thank you. so, it s interesting and curious that we re talking about hearsay evidence. it s extraordinary to me that the committee has been able to get as much information they had as much direct or hearsay given the obstruction. you gentlemen were both asked by the state department not to appear for your depositions, is that correct? we both received, i believe i received initially a letter directing me not to appear. and once the committees issued a subpoena, i was under legal obligation to appear and i am here todayo under subpoena. ambassador, were you also asked not to be part of the deposition?so i was told by the state department don t t appear under these circumstances.