The days biggest political and news stories, with interviews and reporting from around the nation. Thoug a sense the timing of the conversation was while the Manafort Trial was under way . Im going to credit Rudy Giuliani in his last corrected statement in which he says to me that he believes it was quite a bit longer before the trial. Now, manafort was facing a lot of charges in a pretty damning case of tax evasion and bank fraud. It was fairly, you know, high odds that he was going to be convicted based on those case based on those charges and the evidence that the government had. But, again, im just going to let giuliani say what he wants to say, which is that now he remembers it really probably was in june rather than in august. So further along than recently. Did you get a sense at all, carol, from your conversation with Rudy Giuliani as to why today did he mention this . Hes obviously given a lot of interviews in the past. Was it your reading of his intent that maybe he was tryin
name him in the indictment. the president who s compromising the united states and using these pardons that he suggests, that s a violation of his oath of due process. that is to say he s using his oath to protect himself from an investigation. and those he would keep quiet, just as in nixon. if you can give nixon credit, as elizabeth might i wouldn t. he was not as bad as this guy, if that s possible to conceive of. when you think about the fact that michael cohen recorded his conversations with the president, omarosa recorded conversations, and national enquirer holding onto these stories it killed, it seems anybody who was in trump s orbit at least in some case was trying to keep record of some of this negativity and some of this fallout in the event that they would be in the position that they re in today. i m so glad you brought that up. i ve been really drawn to this
knew he d be impeached and removed. but what s going on, and what we see, is that it s necessary to bring the information to the american people to make it clear that this president has more than met the criteria to be impeached. and for that we got 58 constitutional scholars to weigh in and basically we put it on the web, it s a laydown case, and then we have to ask is it urgent to get him out of office. what we re looking at here, ayman, is a question of is this the most important truth in american politics right now? and do we need to stand up for our democracy? and for the safety of the american people? and we believe strongly that the answer to both is yes. tom, before i let you go, very quickly, you spoke about the high office. have you, yourself, considered running for office, yes or no? are you going to run for president, yes or no? so ayman, i don t know if you re aware of this, but the organization that i founded almost six years ago is running
thoug a sense the timing of the conversation was while the manafort trial was under way? i m going to credit rudy giuliani in his last corrected statement in which he says to me that he believes it was quite a bit longer before the trial. now, manafort was facing a lot of charges in a pretty damning case of tax evasion and bank fraud. it was fairly, you know, high odds that he was going to be convicted based on those case based on those charges and the evidence that the government had. but, again, i m just going to let giuliani say what he wants to say, which is that now he remembers it really probably was in june rather than in august. so further along than recently. did you get a sense at all, carol, from your conversation with rudy giuliani as to why today did he mention this? he s obviously given a lot of interviews in the past. was it your reading of his intent that maybe he was trying to send a signal to paul manafort? i don t try to speculate or
brian s back? he doesn t get my room. he s only going to be here for like a week. like a month, tops. oh boy. wi-fi fast enough for the whole family is simple, easy, awesome. in many cultures, young men would stay with their families until their 40 s. paul manafort he is desperately trying to distance himself from michael cohen. well, today, trump hammering his new defense, crimes aren t crimes, and just in case you didn t hear him the first time, he made sure to hit that point a few more times. he pled to two counts that aren t a crime, which nobody understands. those two counts aren t even a crime. a lot of lawyers on television