the law demands the race is over. how? the race is over. we counted them twice. the statutory margins says you have a recount. no one is suggesting there s any mechanism to stop the manual recount other than grace. and bill nelson has to look himself in the mirror and decide whether he wants to be remembered for all the things he s proud of or this one thing. something he s not going to be proud of when it s over. i don t understand how it s consistent with counting every vote. your state doesn t do a great job with the election counter counting every legal and timely cast vote. i get it, but i have two issues for you on this one. one s on point, one s off off point. on point is, scott s been the governor for eight years. the election process there still stinks, okay? that s why we re in this situation. any time it gets close no, it doesn t.
from a perspective of purity. he must know this race is not over. the law demands the race is over. how? the race is over. you re within the margin. we counted them twice. the statutory margins says you have a recount. manual recount. no one is suggesting there s any mechanism to stop the manual recount other than grace. and bill nelson has to look himself in the mirror and decide whether he wants to be remembered for all the things he s proud of or this one thing. something he s not going to be proud of when it s over. i don t understand how it s consistent with counting every vote. your state doesn t do a great job with the election counter counting every legal and timely cast vote. i get it, but i have two issues for you on this one. one s on point, one s off off point. it goes to your perspective. on point is, scott s been the governor for eight years. the election process there still stinks, okay? that s why we re in this
covering up from the very beginning, for nine long months, the origins of the trump-russia hoax. as i argue in my book, he and others never had any evidence of collusion. there was no evidence of crimes or intelligence to justify a counterintelligence probe. rosenstein is a guy who put his signature on a document to renew the wiretap warrant application, and he knew that that was a fabricated, phony document. he didn t present new evidence, as the law demands. he vouched for its authenticity when he knew it was unverified and fabricated, and that is a fraud on the court and abuse of power. laura: mark meadows, it s been 122 years since a member of the executive branch has been impeached. it s a long time. it s a long time. laura: i m not talking about the president, an executive branch employee other than the president.
covering up from the very beginning, for nine long months, the origins of the trump-russia hoax. as a argue in my book, he and others never had any evidence of collusion. there was no evidence of crimes or intelligence to justify a counterintelligence probe. rosenstein is a guy who put his signature on a document to renew the wiretap warrant application, and he knew that that was a fabricated, phony document. he didn t present new evidence, as the law demands. he vouched for its authenticity when he knew it was unverified and fabricated, and that is a fraud on the court and abuse of power. laura: mark meadows, it s been 122 years since a member of the executive branch has been impeached. it s a long time. it s a long time. laura: i m not talking about the president, and executive branch employee other
have always we ve always had. god, does that sound insufficient to the task. insufficient to the task, and yet it is a part of, i think, the american dna. the american governmental dna. but and the question is whether or not we have sufficient amounts of that dna in our system. but there s got to be what does that dna look like? there s got to be something that means people when you say, dna, that means, people make decisions. people in the sdny make the decision that we are going to serve a search warrant on the president s lawyer, because that is what our job and the law demands. yeah, right now it s in the dna, kind of embedded in people of all levels at the department. but if you had a attorney general, for example, who decided he wanted to take a different approach, and said, you know, the president wants this done, i m going to do it, would see that change. the attorney general could probably do some of it. i think the question that trump is going to go away s