people make decisions. people in the fdny make the decision that we are going to serve a search warrant on the president s lawyer, because that is what our job and the law demands. yeah, right now it s in the dna, kind of embedded in people of all levels at the department. but if you had a attorney general who decided he wanted tyke a different approach and said, i m going to do it, you could see that change. the attorney general could probably do some of it. i think the question that trump is going to go away some day. i hope. and one of the questions we ll have to look back and say, you know, kind of like after watergate, are norms enough, or do we need to codify some of these structures that prevent this kind of interference. do you have faith in fundamentally, in the judgment and integrity of jeff sessions to uphold the norms that we re discussing? i worry a great deal. that s not a yes. it s not a yes. and this is a very difficult thing for me to say. this is a v
there are norms that have always we ve always had. god, does that sound insufficient to the task. insufficient to the task, and yet it is a part of, i think, the american dna. the american governmental dna. but we re being tested now. and the question is whether or not we have sufficient amounts of that dna in our system. but there s got to be what does that dna look like? there s got to be something that means people when you say dna, that means like, people make decisions. people in the fdny make the decision that we are going to serve a search warrant on the president s lawyer, because that is what our job and the law demands. yeah, right now it s in the dna, kind of embedded in people of all levels at the department. but if you had a attorney general who decided he wanted tyke a different approach and said, i m going to do it, you could see that change. the attorney general could probably do some of it. i think the question that trump is going to go away some
but there s got to be what does that look like? there s got to be something that means people when you said dna that means people make decisions. people in the sdny make the decision we re going to be a search warrant on the president s lawyer because that is what our job in the law demands. right now it s embedded in people at all level of the department. if you had an attorney general who decided he wanted to take a different approach and said the president wants this done, i m going to do it, you would see people resign and walk away. but the attorney general could probably do some of it. trump is going to go away some day i hope. one of the questions we ll look back and say kind of like after watergate, are norms enough or do we need to codify some of these structures that prevent interference. do you have faith fundamentally in the judgment and integrity of jeff sessions to uphold the norms we re discussing? i worry a great deal. that s not a yes.
american dna, the american governmental dna. we re being tested now. the question is whether or not we have sufficient amounts of that dna in our system. but there s got to be what does that look like? there s got to be something that means people when you said dna that means people make decisions. people in the sdny make the decision we re going to be a search warrant on the president s lawyer because that is what our job in the law demands. right now it s embedded in people at all level of the department. if you had an attorney general who decided he wanted to take a different approach and said the president wants this done, i m going to do it, you would see people resign and walk away. but the attorney general could probably do some of it. trump is going to go away some day i hope. one of the questions we ll look back and say kind of like after watergate, are norms enough or do we need to codify some of these structures that prevent interference? do you have faith fundam
channels can add stability and unpredictable formulations. so why is the main dream media blasting this as a bombshell report? this is what happens in washington. it s important in terms of diplomacy and foreign relations to have other contacts. jon: there is something called the logan act, and there are questions about whether jared kushner violated the logan act. the logan act can t possibly apply under the law because it has been dormant for two centuries. you cannot use a law that is dormant for two centuries. that s a violation of the law. and besides, he wasn t acting as a private citizen as the law demands. he was acting as a government official in the incoming administration. all administrations, including president obama, make contact with foreign governments before the president is sworn in.