Had fabletics. Com, cnn this morning with kasie hunt. Next its tuesday, august 27, right now on cnn this morning hes not a good debater, shes not a smart person. She doesnt want to debate the debate over debates 14 days from the first scheduled president this will debate the two campaigns are needling each other about how to negotiate, what will happen on stage. And russia launches what ukraine says is the largest air attack since the beginning of the war, leaving over half the country in the line of fire. And the state that may decide the outcome of the election battleground, pennsylvania, were going to break down where both candidates stand in the commonwealth. Just a few weeks out from early voting 5 00 a. M. Here in washington alive, looked at the Nations Capital on this Tuesday Morning. Good morning, everyone. Im kasie its wonderful to have you with us were now just 70 days away from election day and just two weeks out from the first scheduled president ial debate between Kamala H
The equal protection clause. But asking this court to invalidate more than 6. 8 million votes, thereby disenfranchising every single voter in the commonwealth. Can you tell me how this result can possibly be justified . Your honor, we are not asking you to invalidate 6. 8 million votes. We are asking [indiscernible] approximately 680,000. [indiscernible] it is somewhat unfair for the isson, but if there something wrong with the ballots, [indiscernible] case, itis particular was a claim, two different and it was that uniformly republicans had no opportunity to observe. And on that basis, the conduct was egregious, premeditated, the conduct was planned. It couldnt have just been done on the spur of the moment. The purpose was to have those ballots examined in secret so that only the democratic officeholder would get to see it. This was in two counties at no place else in the state. I heard a representative of chester county, i believe, say that that didnt happen in their county. If that
Filed on november 15 in 16th 2020. Before we begin i need clarification as to have the defendants would like to proceed , it is the courts preference that the attorney or attorneys for one of the defendants present the general defense and then if it is necessary, the remaining defendants may raise any factual or legal issues that are specific as to that particular defendant, do we agree that that would be the best way to proceed . Good afternoon, i would like to take the lead. If any other lawyers have any other we would do a little round robin if everyone is going to be acknowledged. I dont think i need an Opening Statement but i will give you the opportunity to make one, i have Read Everything that has been docketed, there are a couple minuscule issues i want to take up. You can reasonably anticipate with his desk what those issues will be. Let me just make sure before i to Opening Statements clarify a few items, make sure we are all on the same page, i think we all are. The plaintif
In this portion, the judge questions the Trump Campaign legal team. Portion, the judge questions the Trump Campaign legal team. Judge brann i have some questions. I am going to start with you. You are welcome if you think it is best before answering this to either mr. Giuliani or another, but i am going to ask you because you have been involved in this case from the beginning. You are alleging that the individual plaintiffs, mr. Hendrix and mr. Lawrence, were denied the right to vote under the equal protection clause. But asking this court to invalidate more than 6. 8 million votes, thereby disenfranchising every single voter in the commonwealth. Can you tell me how this result can possibly be justified . Your honor, we are not asking you to invalidate 6. 8 million votes. We are asking [indiscernible] approximately 680,000. [indiscernible] it is somewhat unfair for the isson, but if there something wrong with the ballots, [indiscernible] case, itis particular was a claim, two different
Remaining defendants may raise any factual or legal issues that are specific as to that particular defendant, do we agree that that would be the best way to proceed . Good afternoon, i would like to take the lead. If any other lawyers have any other we would do a little round robin if everyone is going to be acknowledged. I dont think i need an Opening Statement but i will give you the opportunity to make one, i have Read Everything that has been docketed, there are a couple minuscule issues i want to take up. You can reasonably anticipate with his desk what those issues will be. Let me just make sure before i to Opening Statements clarify a few items, make sure we are all on the same page, i think we all are. The plaintiff amended a complaint which was filed this has essentially removed several counts from the original complaint. As i understand now, the only two remaining counts are for alleged violations of equal protections clause of the 14th amendment and the electoral clause, am