De blasio and beto orourke. Then we have bernie sanders, Kamala Harris, joe biden, my boyfriend, Pete Buttigieg and minnows like eric swalwell, andrew yang and john john hickam they are worried the whole thing will turn into the giant circular firing squad. For instance, everyone will be taking hotshots at joe biden. He cant take that. Their new, particularly after controversy surrounding his come as he worked with segregationists back in his early days in the senate. Progressives will have a field day with that gift. Thanks joe and of course, her latest golden boy mayor pete, on all sides for his handling of daily Police Shooting in his town. A south bend indiana where he is the mayor. The police unit and black residents both very angry with him. And then, there are the socialists with their trillion dollar big Spending Plans and moderates could and should push them hard over how they will pay for all of it or any of it. And, all the little guys, they will do all they can to make a na
Session. Its been a flight to safety defensive sectors including real estate and utilities are leading the market, and gold is higher and rates moving lower rates falling below 2 once again. Thanks. We begin with optimism on trade talks with china President Trumps trade adviser Peter Navarro on cnbc earlier said were headed in the right direction as the u. S. Plans more tariffs on europe in the meanwhile. Peter navarro is the white houses fire brand on china, so it was notable this morning after attending that u. S. china meeting that produced the weekends truce, he said its all good were reengaged. Were talking on the phone already. Probably be visits its all good. I think it was a pause that was necessary at the time, but this is very bullish for the markets. Lower uncertainty in terms of the whole thing. Were headed in a very good direction. Next up is figuring out how to slice up huawei along National Security lines. The white house and the Commerce Department are today hosting a m
Atherosclerotic plaques are formed, it also falls out for a reason, as they say, there are appropriate conditions for this, after all, in our country, lets say, the risk of developing atherosclerosis progressively increases with age, and with under certain circumstances, for example , when smoking, when Drinking Alcohol , when eating poorly, when there is insufficient physical activity, well, in general, when a person does not take care of himself, yes, when a person does not take care of himself, this is correct, they are created. And with obesity, of course , certain conditions are created, systemic inflammation, and, lets say, this inflammation does not affect only adipose tissue, it develops in the vascular wall, the inner wall, thats where it begins to be deposited this fraction, forming atherosclerotic plaques, there are also highdensity lipoproteins, this is good cholesterol, we are trying in every possible way to increase it in reasonable ways, here it is. There are also trigly
workers in the lab at that time. if you are able to go back and look at those blood samples and say, did they show antibodies to the covid virus, then that would be another pretty definitive piece of data. and then you would obviously want to have a complete forensics investigation of the lab. but it is these things, these types of things that we do not have still. that has been the lack of transparency that so many people have been talking about. i think the answer to the question that everybody is answering ins noble, but we don t know it because we don t have all the data. sanjay it s interesting because you even spoke to some of the scientists who worked in wuhan. what did they say about how hard it is to get information in china? they say it is really hard. it s interesting because there is this world health investigation i talked to peter dasha who also runs ecohealth alliance, the organization that was doing research in wuhan. so he had sort of two halves that he w
that trump s legal team also filed a motion to fight the subpoena on the grounds of executive privilege, basically that the president and his senior aides can have internal communications that don t have to be shared. this is a separate matter pence s legal time is trying to block it on. pence s team did not comment, nor did the justice department. what i m told pence is doing with this is basically trying to block the testimony they believe is related and pertains to his legislative actions on that day, how he was acting as president of the senate. that could potentially cover a pretty broad swath of his testimony. they re not saying he won t testify overall but that is the argument they re making. we ll see if the former vice president is successful in that. he has written a book where he talked about things that happened leading up to and on january 6th that could potentially complicate this fight when it comes to the former president and to pence himself with this motion.