It means is that this proposal might as well be dead in the water. Because the president has said shes not going to waive the 30 day rule less we work something out and were not going to work something out if it means taking of the public defenders. Sadly, as we are doing this in San Francisco santa clara, by the way just became the first jurisdiction in the bay area, in the region to unanimously vote the board of supervisors in santa clara to move forward with their efforts to fund universal representation. So kudos to santa clara. Excuse me [inaudible] [off mic] well im not sure exactly what it looks like. What i am asking is given that this proposal wont be heard this year, given that the mayor wont budge the president and waive the 30 day rule im asking for special meeting next week so that we can hear from the relevant agencies, all of the agencies, and i dont want to bei dont delete any out but certainly we want to hear from law enforcement, want to hear from Public Health, want
So why on earth would anyone would try to strip out the reference to that income range6 as being middle class is something that i dont really understand. I also do not think that the Mayors Office of housing has indicated that 120 to 150 of ami is upper middle Income Housing. When i did a hearing earlier this year about middle class housing there was a particular Mayors Office office of housing, as upper Income Housing. They did not do that and its presentation never indicated that, and to do that would have been i think inaccurate. Colleagues it is clear that 120 to 150 of ami is middle Income Housing we should not be string this out and send that terrible message to the people of San Francisco. President chiu supervisor olague and before you respond, supervisor olague, our clerk wanted to clarify that the additional language of or other available data you will make that amendment to all references where it refers to data on households earning approximately 120 to 150 . Supervisor ol
Thats all. President chiu supervisor kim. Supervisor kim thank you. Amendment. Im familiar but i just want to supervisor olague i thought it was going to be distributed. Supervisor kim if someone can give me a copy that will be great. Ill say a couple of things. You know, i was hesitant a couple of weeks ago about including 120 to 150, not because i dont think we should calculate it but i was curious as to how we would calculate it. When we build housing for 120 and below there are mechanisms where developers are required to build at this rate and their actual set kind of guidelines on how thats done. So i think the second amendment, asking developers to kind of prenotice im sorry, i dont have the language in fronts of me. I think thats important. As to how its defined, as someone who resides in the 120 to 150ami as we do in this chambers, i dont know how important it is how we define iz as much that we collect that data when we can. My understanding is that the reason why were doing t
Respect all of your opinions, and the things that youre working on. And i personally have my own opinions. Prideful, its disappointing, body language. Im a body worker. Im a master body worker. Its disappointing. You know, youre not hiding youvsr,l know, when you dont , body language speaks powerfully. And im an expert at that, and an energy worker. I guess thats the one thing that i could share is that, you know, set aside the prideful ways, . Iga because the publicsg it. I fought for ross mirkarimi. I know that his neighbor is harassing him. What are you going to do about that. Maybe i should call the police and have them go over to protect ross family. And again, prideful body language, this is my time to speak. Im going to have a recall on our da. I didnt vote for him. I can do that as9 nkt well. I have rights. People for that. So anybody picking on my sheriff, just know that im going to get real committed because im disappointed, what i see in city hall. I cant speak about nudity
So no one is making up a random phrase or arbitrarily putting this label on. This is how we define it. Again i think it is sending a that were not going to were say that say two teachers living together in a household are not really middle income. We just dont feel comfortable referring to them as middle income. I think it sends a very bad message. Colleagues i suggest that we reject this amendment or at least that portion of the vote. President chiu any further discussion . Okay. Amendment. Clerk calvillo supervisor avalos, aye. Supervisor campos, aye. Supervisor campos, aye. President chiu, elsbernd, no. Supervisor farrell, no. Supervisor kim, aye. Supervisor mar, aye. Supervisor wiener, no. There are seven ayes and four nos. President chiu the motion passes. Unless theres further discussion why donthtp we takea roll call vote on the underlying ordinance as amended. Supervisor wiener. Supervisor wiener thank you, mr. President. I did vote against this legislation in committee origin